Literature DB >> 25797410

Clinical tests to diagnose lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: A systematic review.

Abdullah M Alqarni1, Anthony G Schneiders2, Chad E Cook3, Paul A Hendrick4.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to systematically review the diagnostic ability of clinical tests to detect lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. A systematic literature search of six databases, with no language restrictions, from 1950 to 2014 was concluded on February 1, 2014. Clinical tests were required to be compared against imaging reference standards and report, or allow computation, of common diagnostic values. The systematic search yielded a total of 5164 articles with 57 retained for full-text examination, from which 4 met the full inclusion criteria for the review. Study heterogeneity precluded a meta-analysis of included studies. Fifteen different clinical tests were evaluated for their ability to diagnose lumbar spondylolisthesis and one test for its ability to diagnose lumbar spondylolysis. The one-legged hyperextension test demonstrated low to moderate sensitivity (50%-73%) and low specificity (17%-32%) to diagnose lumbar spondylolysis, while the lumbar spinous process palpation test was the optimal diagnostic test for lumbar spondylolisthesis; returning high specificity (87%-100%) and moderate to high sensitivity (60-88) values. Lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis are identifiable causes of LBP in athletes. There appears to be utility to lumbar spinous process palpation for the diagnosis of lumbar spondylolisthesis, however the one-legged hyperextension test has virtually no value in diagnosing patients with spondylolysis.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Lumbar spine; Systematic review; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25797410     DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther Sport        ISSN: 1466-853X            Impact factor:   2.365


  7 in total

Review 1.  Assessment and rehabilitation of chronic low back pain in baseball: part II.

Authors:  Joseph G Wasser; Jason L Zaremski; Daniel C Herman; Heather K Vincent
Journal:  Res Sports Med       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.674

2.  Spondylolysis.

Authors:  Nathan Li; Sam Amarasinghe; Kyle Boudreaux; Waddih Fakhre; William Sherman; Alan Kaye
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-30

Review 3.  A Review of Treatment for Acute and Chronic Pars Fractures in the Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Alexander A Linton; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-05-02

4.  Evidence base and future research directions in the management of low back pain.

Authors:  Allan Abbott
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-03-18

5.  Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of six musculoskeletal preparticipatory screening tests.

Authors:  Nosipho Zumana; Benita Olivier; Lonwabo Godlwana; Candice Martin
Journal:  S Afr J Physiother       Date:  2019-04-24

6.  An Alternative Model of Care for the Treatment of Adolescent Athletes with Extension-Based Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mitchell Selhorst; Richard Rodenberg; Nick Padgett; Anastasia Fischer; Reno Ravindran; James MacDonald
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-02-01

7.  REHABILITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR SPONDYLOLYSIS IN THE YOUTH ATHLETE.

Authors:  Mitchell Selhorst; Michael Allen; Robyn McHugh; James MacDonald
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.