Literature DB >> 25797396

Low compliance with the 2 minutes of uninterrupted chest compressions recommended in the 2010 International Resuscitation Guidelines.

Baltasar Sánchez1, Ramón Algarte2, Enrique Piacentini2, Josep Trenado2, Eduardo Romay2, Manel Cerdà3, Ricard Ferrer2, Salvador Quintana4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze compliance with 2010 European guidelines' quality criteria for external chest compressions (ECC) during 2 minutes of uninterrupted cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
METHODS: Seventy-two healthy nurses and physicians trained in advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed 2 uninterrupted minutes of ECC on a training manikin (Resusci Anne Advanced SkillTrainer; Laerdal Medical AS, Stavanger, Norway) that enabled us to measure the depth and rate of ECC. When professionals agreed to participate in the study, we recorded their age, body mass index (BMI), smoking habit, and their own subjective estimation of their physical fitness. To measure fatigue, we analyzed participants' heart rates, percentage of maximum tolerated heart rate (MHR), and subjective perception of their fatigue on a visual analog scale.
RESULTS: Nearly half (48.6%) the rescuers failed to achieve a minimum average ECC depth of 50 mm. Only 48.1% of ECCs fulfilled the 2010 guidelines' quality criteria; quality deteriorated mainly after the first minute. Poor ECC quality and deteriorating quality after the first minute were associated with BMI < 23 kg/m(2). Rescuers with BMI ≥ 23 kg/m(2) fulfilled the quality criteria throughout the 2 minutes, whereas those with BMI < 23 kg/m(2) fulfilled them for 80% of ECCs during the first minute, but for only 30% at the end of the 2 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with the 2010 guidelines' quality criteria is often poor, mainly due to lack of proper depth. The greater depth recommended in the 2010 guidelines with respect to previous guidelines requires greater force, so BMI < 23 kg/m(2) could hinder compliance. Limiting each rescuer's uninterrupted time doing ECC to 1 minute could help ensure compliance.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation prognosis; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation simulation; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training; Chest compressions; In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25797396     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  4 in total

1.  Can hospital adult code-teams and individual members perform high-quality CPR? A multicenter simulation-based study incorporating an educational intervention with CPR feedback.

Authors:  Jesse M Rideout; Edwin T Ozawa; Darlene J Bourgeois; Micheline Chipman; Frank L Overly
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2021-06-12

2.  Assessing practical skills in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Discrepancy between standard visual evaluation and a mechanical feedback device.

Authors:  Baltasar Sánchez González; Laura Martínez; Manel Cerdà; Enrique Piacentini; Josep Trenado; Salvador Quintana
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Evaluation of the effect of shift cycle time on chest compression quality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Farhad Heydari; Kourosh Eghdami; Majid Zamani; Keihan Golshani; Babak Masoumi
Journal:  Tzu Chi Med J       Date:  2021-02-06

4.  Comparison between manual and mechanical chest compressions during resuscitation in a pediatric animal model of asphyxial cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jorge López; Sarah N Fernández; Rafael González; María J Solana; Javier Urbano; Blanca Toledo; Jesús López-Herce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.