Literature DB >> 25797305

Optimisation of DNA extraction and validation of PCR assays to detect Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis.

Verlaine J Timms1, Hazel M Mitchell2, Brett A Neilan3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate DNA extraction methods and PCR assays suitable for the detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in bovine tissue. The majority of methods currently used to detect M. paratuberculosis have been developed using bovine samples, such as faeces, blood or tissue and, in many cases, have been based on detection from pooled samples from a herd. However most studies have not compared PCR results to culture results. In order to address this problem, four DNA extraction protocols and three PCR assays were employed to detect M. paratuberculosis in bovine tissue. Given that culture is reliable from cows, the results were then compared with the known M. paratuberculosis culture status. The following DNA extractions were included, two commercial kits, a boiling method, an in house extraction based on a published method and enrichment by sonication. The three PCR assays used included single round IS900 and f57 assays and a nested IS900 assay. In addition, another PCR assay was validated for the detection of any Mycobacterial species and a universal bacterial 16S rRNA gene assay was used to detect sample inhibition. The in-house DNA extraction was the most consistent in extracting good quality DNA compared to all other methods. The use of two PCR markers, IS900 and f57, and a universal PCR enabled the correct samples to be identified as M. paratuberculosis positive. In addition, when compared to the culture result, false-positives did not occur and PCR inhibition was readily identified. Using an in house DNA extraction coupled with the IS900 and f57 PCR markers, this study provides a reliable and simple method to detect M. paratuberculosis in both veterinary and spill over infections.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crohn's disease; Inflammatory bowel disease; M. paratuberculosis; MAP; Mycobacterium paratuberculosis; Paratuberculosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25797305     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  8 in total

Review 1.  MAP, Johne's disease and the microbiome; current knowledge and future considerations.

Authors:  Chloe Matthews; Paul D Cotter; Jim O' Mahony
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2021-05-07

2.  Improved Culture Medium (TiKa) for Mycobacterium avium Subspecies Paratuberculosis (MAP) Matches qPCR Sensitivity and Reveals Significant Proportions of Non-viable MAP in Lymphoid Tissue of Vaccinated MAP Challenged Animals.

Authors:  Tim J Bull; Tulika Munshi; Heidi Mikkelsen; Sofie B Hartmann; Maria R Sørensen; Joanna S Garcia; Paula M Lopez-Perez; Sven Hofmann; Kai Hilpert; Gregers Jungersen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Culture-Independent Identification of Mycobacterium avium Subspecies paratuberculosis in Ovine Tissues: Comparison with Bacterial Culture and Histopathological Lesions.

Authors:  Kamal R Acharya; Navneet K Dhand; Richard J Whittington; Karren M Plain
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-12-22

4.  Estimation of the sensitivity and specificity of two serum ELISAs and one fecal qPCR for diagnosis of paratuberculosis in sub-clinically infected young-adult French sheep using latent class Bayesian modeling.

Authors:  Yoann Mathevon; Gilles Foucras; Rémy Falguières; Fabien Corbiere
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Flock sensitivity and specificity of pooled fecal qPCR and pooled serum ELISA for screening ovine paratuberculosis.

Authors:  Yoann Mathevon; Gilles Foucras; Fabien Corbière
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Association of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Verlaine J Timms; George Daskalopoulos; Hazel M Mitchell; Brett A Neilan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of Sample Preparation Methods Used for the Next-Generation Sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Andrea D Tyler; Sara Christianson; Natalie C Knox; Philip Mabon; Joyce Wolfe; Gary Van Domselaar; Morag R Graham; Meenu K Sharma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Optimal DNA Isolation Method for Detection of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria by Polymerase Chain Reaction.

Authors:  Samira Mohammadi; Bahram Nasr Esfahani; Sharareh Moghim; Hossein Mirhendi; Fatemeh Riyahi Zaniani; Hajieh Ghasemian Safaei; Hossein Fazeli; Mahshid Salehi
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2017-10-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.