Sibel Yilmaz-Oner1, Can Oner2, Fatih Mert Dogukan3, Toklong Filam Moses3, Kubra Demir3, Nazar Tekayev3, Neslihan Yilmaz4, Serhan Tuglular5, Haner Direskeneli1. 1. Department of Rheumatology, Marmara University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Istanbul Bilim University, Istanbul, Turkey. 3. School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey. 4. Department of Rheumatology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Bilim University, Istanbul, Turkey. 5. Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and assess the impact of disease activity and psychological distress on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Turkey. METHODS: The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF) -36 was used in a cohort of 113 consecutive patients with SLE and 123 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects to measure HRQoL. Patients' disease activity was assessed with SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) and psychological distress was evaluated by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for all participants. Patients' demographic and clinical data were recorded at the time of HRQoL and HADS testing. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the relationships between demographics, disease duration, disease activity as well as psychological (anxiety and depression) variables and the HRQoL. RESULTS: SLE patients have lower quality of life than healthy controls. No relationship between HRQoL and SLE activity or disease duration were observed. Patients with anxiety and/or depression reported worse SF-36 scores than those without psychological distress. The results of multivariate analysis suggested that HADS-A, HADS-D scores and working status were associated with the impairment of HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: HRQoL is impaired in patients with SLE and is associated with mood disorders. Physicians should pay close attention to detect anxiety and depression and manage them in order to improve the quality of life in patients with SLE.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and assess the impact of disease activity and psychological distress on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Turkey. METHODS: The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF) -36 was used in a cohort of 113 consecutive patients with SLE and 123 age- and gender-matched healthy subjects to measure HRQoL. Patients' disease activity was assessed with SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) and psychological distress was evaluated by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for all participants. Patients' demographic and clinical data were recorded at the time of HRQoL and HADS testing. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the relationships between demographics, disease duration, disease activity as well as psychological (anxiety and depression) variables and the HRQoL. RESULTS:SLEpatients have lower quality of life than healthy controls. No relationship between HRQoL and SLE activity or disease duration were observed. Patients with anxiety and/or depression reported worse SF-36 scores than those without psychological distress. The results of multivariate analysis suggested that HADS-A, HADS-D scores and working status were associated with the impairment of HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: HRQoL is impaired in patients with SLE and is associated with mood disorders. Physicians should pay close attention to detect anxiety and depression and manage them in order to improve the quality of life in patients with SLE.
Authors: S Yilmaz-Oner; B Ilhan; M Can; F Alibaz-Oner; O Polat-Korkmaz; G Ozen; G Mumcu; H M Kremers; S Tuglular; H Direskeneli Journal: Z Rheumatol Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 1.372
Authors: I Etchegaray-Morales; S Méndez-Martínez; C Jiménez-Hernández; C Mendoza-Pinto; N E Alonso-García; A Montiel-Jarquín; A López-Colombo; A García-Villaseñor; M H Cardiel; M García-Carrasco Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 3.240