Literature DB >> 25796362

Identification of Extracolonic Pathologies by Computed Tomographic Colonography in Colorectal Cancer Symptomatic Patients.

Steve Halligan1, Katherine Wooldrage2, Edward Dadswell2, Urvi Shah2, Ines Kralj-Hans2, Christian von Wagner3, Omar Faiz2, Julian Teare2, Rob Edwards4, Clive Kay5, Guiqing Yao6, Richard J Lilford7, Dion Morton8, Jane Wardle3, Wendy Atkin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer may originate outside the colorectum. Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is used to examine the colorectum and abdominopelvic organs simultaneously. We performed a prospective randomized controlled trial to quantify the frequency, nature, and consequences of extracolonic findings.
METHODS: We studied 5384 patients from 21 UK National Health Service hospitals referred by their family doctor for the investigation of colorectal cancer symptoms from March 2004 through December 2007. The patients were assigned randomly to groups that received the requested test (barium enema or colonoscopy, n = 3574) or CTC (n = 1810). We determined the frequency and nature of extracolonic findings, subsequent investigations, ultimate diagnosis, and extracolonic cancer diagnoses 1 and 3 years after testing patients without colorectal cancer.
RESULTS: Extracolonic pathologies were detected in 959 patients by CTC (58.7%), in 42 patients by barium enema analysis (1.9%), and in no patients by colonoscopy. Extracolonic findings were investigated in 142 patients (14.2%) and a diagnosis was made for 126 patients (88.1%). Symptoms were explained by extracolonic findings in 4 patients analyzed by barium enema (0.2%) and in 33 patients analyzed by CTC (2.8%). CTC identified 72 extracolonic neoplasms, however, barium enema analysis found only 3 (colonoscopy found none). Overall, CTC diagnosed extracolonic neoplasms in 72 of 1634 patients (4.4%); 26 of these were malignant (1.6%). There were significantly more extracolonic malignancies detected than expected 1 year after examination, but these did not differ between patients evaluated by CTC (22.2/1000 person-years), barium enema (26.5/1000 person-years; P = .43), or colonoscopy (32.0/1000 person-years; P = .88).
CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the patients with symptoms of colorectal cancer are found to have extracolonic pathologies by CTC analysis. However, the proportion of patients found to have extracolonic malignancies after 1 year of CTC examination is not significantly greater than after barium enema or colonoscopy examinations. International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials no: 95152621.isrctn.com.
Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon Cancer; Detection; Diagnostic; Digestive System

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25796362     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  6 in total

Review 1.  CT colonography for surveillance of patients with colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic efficacy.

Authors:  François Porté; Mallikarjuna Uppara; George Malietzis; Omar Faiz; Steve Halligan; Thanos Athanasiou; David Burling
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of extracolonic findings and clinical outcomes in a screening and diagnostic CT colonography population.

Authors:  Michio Taya; Cody McHargue; Zina J Ricci; Milana Flusberg; Stefanie Weinstein; Judy Yee
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-02

3.  Computed tomography colonography versus colonoscopy for detection of colorectal cancer: a diagnostic performance study.

Authors:  Junping Sha; Jun Chen; Xuguang Lv; Shaoxin Liu; Ruihong Chen; Zhibing Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  The bowel and beyond: extracolonic findings from CT colonography.

Authors:  Gerard Lambe; Peter Hughes; Louise Rice; Caoimhe McDonnell; Mark Murphy; Ciaran Judge; Michael Guiney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Robotic, self-propelled, self-steerable, and disposable colonoscopes: Reality or pipe dream? A state of the art review.

Authors:  Conchubhair Winters; Venkataraman Subramanian; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 5.374

Review 6.  Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline - Update 2020.

Authors:  Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Davide Bellini; David Burling; Giovanni Cappello; Cristina Carretero; Evelien Dekker; Rami Eliakim; Margriet de Haan; Michal F Kaminski; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Andrea Laghi; Philippe Lefere; Thomas Mang; Sebastian Manuel Milluzzo; Martina Morrin; Deirdre McNamara; Emanuele Neri; Silvia Pecere; Mathieu Pioche; Andrew Plumb; Emanuele Rondonotti; Manon Cw Spaander; Stuart Taylor; Ignacio Fernandez-Urien; Jeanin E van Hooft; Jaap Stoker; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.