Linda-Dalal Shiber1, Thomas Lang2, Resad Pasic2. 1. Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. Electronic address: lindashiber@gmail.com. 2. Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To review the indications, rationale, and technique for abdominal cerclage, specifically focusing on a laparoscopic approach to this procedure during the first trimester of pregnancy. DESIGN: This is an educational video directed toward gynecologic surgeons. Patient consent was obtained for use of surgical video footage, and Institutional Review Board exemption was granted. A patient case is discussed and a step-by-step description of the technique used to perform laparoscopic cerclage in the first trimester of pregnancy is demonstrated using surgical footage. SETTING: The estimated incidence of cervical insufficiency affecting pregnancy is as high as 1%. Cervical cerclage placement is the treatment for this condition. Although most cerclages are placed transvaginally via the Shirodkar or McDonald technique, abdominal cerclage is necessary in women with a previous failed transvaginal cerclage or in those with minimal cervical tissue accessible vaginally [1,2]. Both laparoscopic and robotic approaches to this procedure have been developed, allowing patients to enjoy a more rapid recovery as well as to avoid an unnecessary laparotomy[3-6]. The observational studies reporting outcomes for laparoscopic-assisted abdominal cerclage quote fetal survival rates of >85%, which is comparable to the rates for abdominal cerclage[7-18]. Complication rates are low, also congruent with the laparotomic approach[12-18]. INTERVENTION: The patient, a 35-year-old gravida 3, para 1, 0, 1, 1, at 11 weeks gestation, had a history of a full-term vaginal delivery followed by an excisional procedure for cervical dysplasia, and then an early second trimester pregnancy loss. She was referred for laparoscopic-assisted abdominal cerclage after a severely shortened cervix was noted on examination. Laparoscopic cerclage placement was uncomplicated, with minimal blood loss encountered. The patient did well in the immediate postoperative period and was discharged home on postoperative day 1. The remainder of the pregnancy was uneventful, and she delivered via scheduled cesarean section at term. CONCLUSION: With proper patient selection and operative planning, the technique of laparoscopic cerclage is both safe and advantageous in terms of faster recovery. Obstetric outcomes are equivalent, if not superior, to an open abdominal approach to this procedure.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To review the indications, rationale, and technique for abdominal cerclage, specifically focusing on a laparoscopic approach to this procedure during the first trimester of pregnancy. DESIGN: This is an educational video directed toward gynecologic surgeons. Patient consent was obtained for use of surgical video footage, and Institutional Review Board exemption was granted. A patient case is discussed and a step-by-step description of the technique used to perform laparoscopic cerclage in the first trimester of pregnancy is demonstrated using surgical footage. SETTING: The estimated incidence of cervical insufficiency affecting pregnancy is as high as 1%. Cervical cerclage placement is the treatment for this condition. Although most cerclages are placed transvaginally via the Shirodkar or McDonald technique, abdominal cerclage is necessary in women with a previous failed transvaginal cerclage or in those with minimal cervical tissue accessible vaginally [1,2]. Both laparoscopic and robotic approaches to this procedure have been developed, allowing patients to enjoy a more rapid recovery as well as to avoid an unnecessary laparotomy[3-6]. The observational studies reporting outcomes for laparoscopic-assisted abdominal cerclage quote fetal survival rates of >85%, which is comparable to the rates for abdominal cerclage[7-18]. Complication rates are low, also congruent with the laparotomic approach[12-18]. INTERVENTION: The patient, a 35-year-old gravida 3, para 1, 0, 1, 1, at 11 weeks gestation, had a history of a full-term vaginal delivery followed by an excisional procedure for cervical dysplasia, and then an early second trimester pregnancy loss. She was referred for laparoscopic-assisted abdominal cerclage after a severely shortened cervix was noted on examination. Laparoscopic cerclage placement was uncomplicated, with minimal blood loss encountered. The patient did well in the immediate postoperative period and was discharged home on postoperative day 1. The remainder of the pregnancy was uneventful, and she delivered via scheduled cesarean section at term. CONCLUSION: With proper patient selection and operative planning, the technique of laparoscopic cerclage is both safe and advantageous in terms of faster recovery. Obstetric outcomes are equivalent, if not superior, to an open abdominal approach to this procedure.