Literature DB >> 25796121

Optimization of a PGSS (particles from gas saturated solutions) process for a fenofibrate lipid-based solid dispersion formulation.

Aude Pestieau1, Fabrice Krier2, Pierre Lebrun3, Adeline Brouwers4, Bruno Streel4, Brigitte Evrard2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a formulation containing fenofibrate and Gelucire(®) 50/13 (Gattefossé, France) in order to improve the oral bioavailability of the drug. Particles from gas saturated solutions (PGSS) process was chosen for investigation as a manufacturing process for producing a solid dispersion. The PGSS process was optimized according to the in vitro drug dissolution profile obtained using a biphasic dissolution test. Using a design of experiments approach, the effects of nine experimental parameters were investigated using a PGSS apparatus provided by Separex(®) (Champigneulles, France). Within the chosen experimental conditions, the screening results showed that the drug loading level, the autoclave temperature and pressure, the connection temperature and the nozzle diameter had a significant influence on the dissolution profile of fenofibrate. During the optimization step, the three most relevant parameters were optimized using a central composite design, while other factors remained fixed. In this way, we were able to identify the optimal production conditions that would deliver the highest level of fenofibrate in the organic phase at the end of the dissolution test. The closeness between the measured and the predicted optimal dissolution profiles in the organic phase demonstrated the validity of the statistical analyses.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetonitrile (PubChem CID: 6342); Biphasic dissolution test; Carbon dioxide (PubChem CID: 280); Design of experiments; Dimethyl sulfoxide (PubChem CID: 679); Fenofibrate; Fenofibrate (PubChem CID: 3339); Hydrochloric acid (PubChem CID: 313); Octanol (PubChem CID: 957); Particles from gas saturated solutions; Solid dispersion; Supercritical carbon dioxide; Water (PubChem CID: 962)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25796121     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pharm        ISSN: 0378-5173            Impact factor:   5.875


  5 in total

Review 1.  Heat Shock Proteins and Autophagy Pathways in Neuroprotection: from Molecular Bases to Pharmacological Interventions.

Authors:  Botond Penke; Ferenc Bogár; Tim Crul; Miklós Sántha; Melinda E Tóth; László Vígh
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 2.  Using Supercritical Fluid Technology as a Green Alternative During the Preparation of Drug Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Paroma Chakravarty; Amin Famili; Karthik Nagapudi; Mohammad A Al-Sayah
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 3.  Supercritical fluid technology for solubilization of poorly water soluble drugs via micro- and naonosized particle generation.

Authors:  Shashi Kiran Misra; Kamla Pathak
Journal:  ADMET DMPK       Date:  2020-06-29

Review 4.  Supercritical Fluid Technologies for the Incorporation of Synthetic and Natural Active Compounds into Materials for Drug Formulation and Delivery.

Authors:  Katja Andrina Kravanja; Matjaž Finšgar; Željko Knez; Maša Knez Marevci
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 6.525

5.  Modeling of the Production of Lipid Microparticles Using PGSS® Technique.

Authors:  Clara López-Iglesias; Enriqueta R López; Josefa Fernández; Mariana Landin; Carlos A García-González
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.