Literature DB >> 25795485

Variations in automatically recorded rumination time as explained by variations in intake of dietary fractions and milk production, and between-cow variation.

M V Byskov1, E Nadeau2, B E O Johansson3, P Nørgaard4.   

Abstract

Individual recording of rumination time (RT) is now possible in commercial dairy herds, through development of a microphone-based sensor, which is able to record RT by the sound of rumination activity. The objectives of this study were to examine the relationship between daily RT and intakes of different dietary fractions, the relationship between RT in minutes per kilogram of dry matter intake (DMI) and milk production, and to examine the variation in RT within and between mid-lactating dairy cows. Data from 3 production trials were used in which a total of 27 different diets were fed. The data contained 761, 290, and 203 daily recordings of RT, milk yield, milk components, DMI, and intake of dietary fractions recorded on 29, 26, and 24 Holstein and Swedish Red cows from trials 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The dietary fractions included forage neutral detergent fiber (NDF), concentrate NDF, crude protein, sugar, starch, and the remaining fraction represented by organic matter--(forage NDF+concentrate NDF+crude protein+sugar+starch). The relationship between the dietary fractions and RT was analyzed in 2 steps. In step 1, the dietary fractions, which were significantly related to RT, were selected and simultaneously checked for multicollinearity between the dietary components; in step 2, a multivariate model, including the effect of repeated measurements, the main effect of the selected dietary fractions from step 1, random effects of cow(trial) and trial, and information on breed, days in milk, and parity was used to analyze the relationship between RT and the selected dietary fractions. Relationships between RT in minutes per kilogram of DMI and milk yield and milk components were analyzed, using the same multivariate model as in step 2. Approximately 32% of the variation in daily RT could be explained by variations in intakes of the dietary fractions, whereas 48% of the total variation in RT was accounted for by individual variations between cows. Intakes of forage NDF and starch were positively related to daily RT, whereas intakes of sugar and the remaining fraction were negatively related to daily RT. Rumination time in minutes per kilogram of DMI was negatively related to milk yield and protein percentage, but positively related to milk fat percentage.
Copyright © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dietary fraction; milk yield; rumination time

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25795485     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  5 in total

1.  Monitoring cow activity and rumination time for an early detection of heat stress in dairy cow.

Authors:  Fabio Abeni; Andrea Galli
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  The Effect of Rumination Time on Milk Performance and Methane Emission of Dairy Cows Fed Partial Mixed Ration Based on Maize Silage.

Authors:  Robert Mikuła; Marcin Pszczola; Katarzyna Rzewuska; Sebastian Mucha; Włodzimierz Nowak; Tomasz Strabel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Brief Research Report: How Do Claw Disorders Affect Activity, Body Weight, and Milk Yield of Multiparous Holstein Dairy Cows?

Authors:  Luisa Magrin; Giulio Cozzi; Isabella Lora; Paola Prevedello; Flaviana Gottardo
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-02-25

Review 4.  Global Warming and Dairy Cattle: How to Control and Reduce Methane Emission.

Authors:  Dovilė Bačėninaitė; Karina Džermeikaitė; Ramūnas Antanaitis
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  Unraveling the Relationship between Milk Yield and Quality at the Test Day with Rumination Time Recorded by a PLF Technology.

Authors:  Rosanna Marino; Francesca Petrera; Marisanna Speroni; Teresa Rutigliano; Andrea Galli; Fabio Abeni
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.