Maximilian J Johnston1, Sonal Arora2, Dominic King3, George Bouras4, Alex M Almoudaris2, Rachel Davis2, Ara Darzi4. 1. Centre for Patient Safety and Service Quality, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK. Electronic address: m.johnston@imperial.ac.uk. 2. Centre for Patient Safety and Service Quality, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK. 3. Centre for Health Policy, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK. 4. Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between the ability to recognize and respond to patient deterioration (escalate care) and its role in preventing failure to rescue (FTR; mortality after a surgical complication) has not been explored. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the incidence of, and factors contributing to, FTR and delayed escalation of care for surgical patients. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE PsycINFO, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted to identify articles exploring FTR, escalation of care, and interventions that influence outcomes. Screening of 19,887 citations led to inclusion of 42 articles. RESULTS: The reported incidence of FTR varied between 8.0 and 16.9%. FTR was inversely related to hospital volume and nurse staffing levels. Delayed escalation occurred in 20.7-47.1% of patients and was associated with greater mortality rates in 4 studies (P < .05). Causes of delayed escalation included hierarchy and failures in communication. Of five interventional studies, two reported a significant decrease in intensive care admissions (P < .01) after introduction of escalation protocols; only 1 study reported an improvement in mortality. CONCLUSION: This systematic review explored factors linking FTR and escalation of care in surgery. Important factors that contribute to the avoidance of preventable harm include the recognition and communication of serious deterioration to implement definitive treatment. Targeted interventions aiming to improve these factors may contribute to enhanced patient outcome.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between the ability to recognize and respond to patient deterioration (escalate care) and its role in preventing failure to rescue (FTR; mortality after a surgical complication) has not been explored. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the incidence of, and factors contributing to, FTR and delayed escalation of care for surgical patients. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE PsycINFO, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted to identify articles exploring FTR, escalation of care, and interventions that influence outcomes. Screening of 19,887 citations led to inclusion of 42 articles. RESULTS: The reported incidence of FTR varied between 8.0 and 16.9%. FTR was inversely related to hospital volume and nurse staffing levels. Delayed escalation occurred in 20.7-47.1% of patients and was associated with greater mortality rates in 4 studies (P < .05). Causes of delayed escalation included hierarchy and failures in communication. Of five interventional studies, two reported a significant decrease in intensive care admissions (P < .01) after introduction of escalation protocols; only 1 study reported an improvement in mortality. CONCLUSION: This systematic review explored factors linking FTR and escalation of care in surgery. Important factors that contribute to the avoidance of preventable harm include the recognition and communication of serious deterioration to implement definitive treatment. Targeted interventions aiming to improve these factors may contribute to enhanced patient outcome.
Authors: Rupen Shah; Kristopher Attwood; Shipra Arya; Daniel E Hall; Jason M Johanning; Emmanuel Gabriel; Anthony Visioni; Steven Nurkin; Moshim Kukar; Steven Hochwald; Nader N Massarweh Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Justin S Hatchimonji; Elinore J Kaufman; Catherine E Sharoky; Lucy Ma; Anna E Garcia Whitlock; Daniel N Holena Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Anders Winther Voldby; Anders Watt Boolsen; Anne Albers Aaen; Jakob Burcharth; Sarah Ekeløf; Roberto Loprete; Simon Jønck; Hassan Ali Eskandarani; Lau Caspar Thygesen; Ann Merete Møller; Birgitte Brandstrup Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2022-05-23 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Anai N Kothari; Barbara A Blanco; Sarah A Brownlee; Ann E Evans; Victor A Chang; Gerard J Abood; Raffaella Settimi; Daniela S Raicu; Paul C Kuo Journal: Surgery Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Tiffany Pellathy; Melissa Saul; Gilles Clermont; Artur W Dubrawski; Michael R Pinsky; Marilyn Hravnak Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 1.977
Authors: Donald S Likosky; Raymond J Strobel; Xiaoting Wu; Robert S Kramer; Baron L Hamman; James K Brevig; Michael P Thompson; Amir A Ghaferi; Min Zhang; Eric J Lehr Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2021-01-29 Impact factor: 6.439