Literature DB >> 25794294

Medical professionalism in China and the United States: a transcultural interpretation.

Jing-Bao Nie1, Kirk L Smith2, Yali Cong3, Linying Hu4, Joseph D Tucker5.   

Abstract

As in other societies, medical professionalism in the Peoples' Republic of China has been rapidly evolving. One of the major events in this process was the endorsement in 2005 of the document, "Medical Professionalism in the New Millennium: A Physician Charter," by the Chinese Medical Doctor Association (hereafter, the Charter)(1). More recently, a national survey, the first on such a large scale, was conducted on Chinese physicians' attitudes toward the fundamental principles and core commitments put forward in the Charter. Based on empirical findings from that study and comparing them to the published results of a similar American survey, the authors offer an in-depth interpretation of significant cross-cultural differences and important transcultural commonalities. The broader historical, socio-economic, and ethical issues relating to salient Chinese cultural practices such as family consent, familism (the custom of deferring decisions to family members), and the withholding of medical information, as well as controversial topics such as not respecting patients' autonomy, are examined. The Chinese Survey found that Chinese physicians supported the principles of the Charter in general. Here we argue that Chinese culture and traditional medical ethics are broadly compatible with the moral commitments demanded by modern medical professionalism. Methodologically and theoretically-recognizing the problems inherent in the hoary but still popular habit of dichotomizing cultures and in relativism-a transcultural approach is adopted that gives greater (due) weight to the internal moral diversity present within every culture, the common ground shared by different cultures, and the primacy of morality. Genuine cross-cultural dialogue, including a constructive Chinese-American dialogue in the area of medical professionalism, is not only possible, but necessary. Copyright 2015 The Journal of Clinical Ethics. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25794294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ethics        ISSN: 1046-7890


  6 in total

1.  Doctor can I buy a new kidney? I've heard it isn't forbidden: what is the role of the nephrologist when dealing with a patient who wants to buy a kidney?

Authors:  Giorgina Barbara Piccoli; Laura Sacchetti; Laura Verzè; Franco Cavallo
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 2.464

Review 2.  Physician-Assisted Suicide in Dementia: Paradoxes, Pitfalls and the Need for Prudence.

Authors:  Ravi Philip Rajkumar
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-12-22

3.  Truth-telling to the patient, family, and the sexual partner: a rights approach to the role of healthcare providers in adult HIV disclosure in China.

Authors:  Jing-Bao Nie; Simon Thomas Walker; Shan Qiao; Xiaoming Li; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2015

4.  Practice of informed consent in Guangdong, China: a qualitative study from the perspective of in-hospital patients.

Authors:  Ni Gong; Yinhua Zhou; Yu Cheng; Xiaoqiong Chen; Xuting Li; Xia Wang; Guiting Chen; Jingyu Chen; Hongyan Meng; Meifen Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Will legal international rhino horn trade save wild rhino populations?

Authors:  Jasper A J Eikelboom; Rascha J M Nuijten; Yingying X G Wang; Bradley Schroder; Ignas M A Heitkönig; Wolf M Mooij; Frank van Langevelde; Herbert H T Prins
Journal:  Glob Ecol Conserv       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 6.  Structured medical electives: a concept whose time has come?

Authors:  Chris Willott; Eva Khair; Roger Worthington; Katy Daniels; A Mark Clarfield
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 4.185

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.