Literature DB >> 25794266

Predicting Motor Vehicle Collisions in a Driving Simulator in Young Adults Using the Useful Field of View Assessment.

Benjamin McManus1,2, Molly K Cox1, David E Vance3, Despina Stavrinos1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Being involved in motor vehicle collisions is the leading cause of death in 1- to 34-year-olds, and risk is particularly high in young adults. The Useful Field of View (UFOV) task, a cognitive measure of processing speed, divided attention, and selective attention, has been shown to be predictive of motor vehicle collisions in older adults, but its use as a predictor of driving performance in a young adult population has not been investigated. The present study examined whether UFOV was a predictive measure of motor vehicle collisions in a driving simulator in a young adult population.
METHOD: The 3-subtest version of UFOV (lower scores measured in milliseconds indicate better performance) was administered to 60 college students. Participants also completed an 11-mile simulated drive to provide driving performance metrics.
RESULTS: Findings suggested that subtests 1 and 2 suffered from a ceiling effect. UFOV subtest 3 significantly predicted collisions in the simulated drive. Each 30 ms slower on the subtest was associated with nearly a 10% increase in the risk of a simulated collision. Post hoc analyses revealed a small partially mediating effect of subtest 3 on the relationship between driving experience and collisions.
CONCLUSION: The selective attention component of UFOV subtest 3 may be a predictive measure of crash involvement in a young adult population. Improvements in selective attention may be the underlying mechanism in how driving experience improves driving performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  driving experience; driving simulator; selective attention; top-down processing; useful field of view

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25794266      PMCID: PMC4575826          DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1027339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev        ISSN: 1538-9588            Impact factor:   1.491


  18 in total

1.  Effects of aging on the useful field of view.

Authors:  A B Sekuler; P J Bennett; M Mamelak
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Speed-of-processing and driving simulator training result in improved driving performance.

Authors:  Daniel L Roenker; Gayla M Cissell; Karlene K Ball; Virginia G Wadley; Jerri D Edwards
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday performance.

Authors:  J D Edwards; V G Wadley; D E Vance; K Wood; D L Roenker; K K Ball
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.658

4.  Visual impairment and the useful field of vision.

Authors:  Susan J Leat; Jan Lovie-Kitchin
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday functions.

Authors:  Karlene Ball; Jerri D Edwards; Lesley A Ross
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Cognitive training decreases motor vehicle collision involvement of older drivers.

Authors:  Karlene Ball; Jerri D Edwards; Lesley A Ross; Gerald McGwin
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view.

Authors:  K K Ball; B L Beard; D L Roenker; R L Miller; D S Griggs
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Cognitive functioning and driving simulator performance in middle-aged and older adults with HIV.

Authors:  David E Vance; Pariya L Fazeli; David A Ball; Larry Z Slater; Lesley A Ross
Journal:  J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.354

9.  Impact of distracted driving on safety and traffic flow.

Authors:  Despina Stavrinos; Jennifer L Jones; Annie A Garner; Russell Griffin; Crystal A Franklin; David Ball; Sharon C Welburn; Karlene K Ball; Virginia P Sisiopiku; Philip R Fine
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2013-02-12

10.  Processing speed training increases the efficiency of attentional resource allocation in young adults.

Authors:  Wesley K Burge; Lesley A Ross; Franklin R Amthor; William G Mitchell; Alexander Zotov; Kristina M Visscher
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  6 in total

1.  Impact of adolescent media multitasking on cognition and driving safety.

Authors:  Despina Stavrinos; Benjamin McManus; Andrea T Underhill; Maria T Lechtreck
Journal:  Hum Behav Emerg Technol       Date:  2019-04-26

2.  Pain, Pain Catastrophizing, and Individual Differences in Executive Function in Adolescence.

Authors:  Tyler Bell; Jessica H Mirman; Despina Stavrinos
Journal:  Child Health Care       Date:  2018-02-28

3.  Cannabis use and driving-related performance in young recreational users: a within-subject randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tatiana Ogourtsova; Maja Kalaba; Isabelle Gelinas; Nicol Korner-Bitensky; Mark A Ware
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-10-14

4.  Patients with Cervical Dystonia Demonstrated Decreased Cognitive Abilities and Visual Planning Compared to Controls.

Authors:  Marina S C Bastos; Renato Nickel; Carlos H F Camargo; Hélio A G Teive
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2021-06-19

5.  Usability of Norm Values on Results from a Simulator Device and Cognitive Tests in Traffic Medicine.

Authors:  Kersti Samuelsson; Ewa Wressle
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-03-10

6.  Testing a Computerized Cognitive Training Protocol in Adults Aging With HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders: Randomized Controlled Trial Rationale and Protocol.

Authors:  David Vance; Pariya Fazeli; John Shacka; William Nicholson; Peggy McKie; James Raper; Andres Azuero; Virginia Wadley; Karlene Ball
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-04-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.