Literature DB >> 25792881

The Effect of Vertical Oscillatory Pressure (VOP) on Youths and Elderly Adult Low Back Pain (LBP) Intensity and Lumbo-Sacral Mobility.

Michael Ogbonnia Egwu1, Adewale Akeem Ojeyinka1, Matthew Olatokumbo B Olaogun1.   

Abstract

The effect of Vertical Oscillatory Pressure (VOP) on Low Back Pain (LBP) intensity and lumbo-sacral mobility in youths compared to elders was examined. Eighty five male (56) and female (29) subjects comprising 45 youths (18-28 years old) and 42 elders (65-75 years old), including LBP (40) and pain-free individuals participated in the study. Subjects with LBP received VOP on each vertebra from the first lumbar to the sacrum, 10 oscillations in one minute repeated at each vertebra. Pain intensity (measured using Borg's 10 point scale) and mobility were measured at the start, after VOP and five minutes after cryotherapy. Control subjects did not receive VOP and cryotherapy but had their sensory perception and spinal mobility measured at the start, after 15 and 26 minutes respectively. Pain intensity decreased significantly [elders, p<0.01; youths, p<0.05] while the range of forward and side flexions increased significantly (p<0.05) only in elders after VOP. Cryotherapy after VOP therapy did not add any significant effect on pain intensity and trunk mobility. Mobility and perceptual levels of the control subjects did not alter significantly. Pain intensity and flexion (forward and side flexions in elders only) are improved by VOP and should be preferred spinal mobilization therapy outcome measures in youths and elders with LBP respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vertical Oscillatory Pressure; low back pain intensity; lumbo-sacral mobility; therapeutic outcome measures; youths and elders

Year:  2007        PMID: 25792881      PMCID: PMC4316535          DOI: 10.1298/jjpta.10.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc        ISSN: 1344-1272


  34 in total

1.  Three-dimensional lumbar spinal kinematics: a study of range of movement in 100 healthy subjects aged 20 to 60+ years.

Authors:  G Van Herp; P Rowe; P Salter; J P Paul
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  Reproducibility and repeatability: errors of three groups of physiotherapists in locating spinal levels by palpation.

Authors:  E V Billis; N E Foster; C C Wright
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2003-11

3.  Course and prognosis of back pain in primary care: the epidemiological perspective.

Authors:  Peter R Croft; Kate M Dunn; Heiner Raspe
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Arm-span, height, and age in black and white women.

Authors:  M F Steele; T C Chenier
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.533

5.  Reduction of lumbar disc prolapse by manipulation.

Authors:  J A Mathews; D A Ytes
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1969-09-20

Review 6.  Pain mechanisms: a new theory.

Authors:  R Melzack; P D Wall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Membrane potential oscillations in dorsal root ganglion neurons: role in normal electrogenesis and neuropathic pain.

Authors:  R Amir; M Michaelis; M Devor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients.

Authors:  T G Mayer; A F Tencer; S Kristoferson; V Mooney
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.

Authors:  G A Borg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.