| Literature DB >> 25792809 |
Nemat Z Yassin1, Siham M El-Shenawy1, Rehab F Abdel-Rahman1, Mostafa Yakoot2, Mohamed Hassan3, Sherine Helmy4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effect of topical application of a Copper indomethacin (Cu-Indo) gel preparation on monosodium iodoacetate (MIA) induced arthritis of the knee joint of rats and to test our hypothesis that copper complex of indomethacin could be a more potent anti-inflammatory agent than its parent compound.Entities:
Keywords: copper indomethacin gel; monosodium iodoacetate; osteoarthritis; rats
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25792809 PMCID: PMC4362896 DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S79957
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther ISSN: 1177-8881 Impact factor: 4.162
Dunnett multicomparison test for serum markers in osteoarthritis group versus the normal and sham groups
| Dependent variable and (I) control groups | (J) Untreated induced OA group | Mean difference (I, J) | Standard error | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interleukin 6 | ||||
| Normal | Induced OA | −15.83 | 2.88 | 0.000 |
| Sham | Induced OA | −8.55 | 2.88 | 0.011 |
| Interleukin 8 | ||||
| Normal | Induced OA | −38.86 | 16.38 | 0.032 |
| Sham | Induced OA | −18.17 | 16.38 | 0.232 |
| Tumor necrosis factor | ||||
| Normal | Induced OA | −47.01 | 6.85 | 0.000 |
| Sham | Induced OA | −36.27 | 6.85 | 0.000 |
Notes:
Mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. Dunnett’s test treat one group as a control (J), and compare all other groups (I) against it.
Abbreviation: OA, osteoarthritis.
One-way analysis of variance test for comparison of treatment effect on inflammatory cytokines
| Studied Cytokines & Treatment groups | N | Mean | Standard deviation | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interleukin 8 | |||||
| Induced OA (not treated) | 5 | 17.47 | 21.58 | <0.001 | |
| Cu-Indo 1 g/kg | 5 | 159.63 | 35.49 | ||
| Cu-Indo 0.5 g/kg | 5 | 143.65 | 13.96 | ||
| Cu-Indo 0.25 g/kg | 5 | 14.95 | |||
| Indomethacin 1 g/kg | 5 | 164.63 | 21.11 | ||
| Interleukin 6 | |||||
| Induced OA (not treated) | 5 | 6.70 | 10.58 | <0.001 | |
| Cu-Indo 1 g/kg | 5 | 71.69 | 4.83 | ||
| Cu-Indo 0.5 g/kg | 5 | 67.93 | 5.54 | ||
| Cu-Indo 0.25 g/kg | 5 | 62.35 | 3.80 | ||
| Indomethacin 1 g/kg | 5 | 69.07 | 4.99 | ||
| Tumor necrosis factor | |||||
| Induced OA (not treated) | 5 | 10.64 | 11.48 | <0.001 | |
| Cu-Indo 1 g/kg | 5 | 86.42 | 10.65 | ||
| Cu-Indo 0.5 g/kg | 5 | 93.96 | 9.08 | ||
| Cu-Indo 0.25 g/kg | 5 | 93.01 | 9.47 | ||
| Indomethacin 1 g/kg | 5 | 106.43 | 10.13 | ||
Note: The bold figures represent the significantly different group (in posthoc Tukey tests).
Abbreviation: OA, osteoarthritis; Cu-Indo, copper indomethacin.
Post hoc Tukey HSD* test for intergroup comparisons of interleukin 6
| Treatment group | N | Subset for alpha =0.05
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | ||
| Cu-Indo 0.25 g/kg | 5 | ||
| Cu-Indo 0.5 g/kg | 5 | ||
| Indomethacin 1 g/kg | 5 | ||
| Cu-Indo 1 g/kg | 5 | ||
| Induced osteoarthritis (untreated) | 5 | ||
| Significance | 0.07 | 1.00 | |
Notes:
Uses harmonic mean sample size =5.000. The bold figures represent significantly different means.
Abbreviations: Cu-Indo, copper indomethacin; HSD, honest significant difference.
Post hoc Tukey HSD test for intergroup comparisons of interleukin 8
| Treatment group | N | Subset for alpha = 0.05
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Cu-Indo 0.25 g/kg | 5 | |||
| Cu-Indo 0.5 g/kg | 5 | |||
| Cu-Indo 1 g/kg | 5 | 159.63 | 159.63 | |
| Indomethacin 1 g/kg | 5 | 164.63 | 164.63 | |
| Induced osteoarthritis (untreated) | 5 | |||
| Significance | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.15 | |
Note: The bold figures represent significantly different means.
Abbreviations: Cu-Indo, copper indomethacin; HSD, honest significant difference.
Post hoc Tukey HSD* test for intergroup comparisons of TNF-α
| Treatment group | N | Subset for alpha = 0.05
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Cu-Indo 1 g/kg | 5 | |||
| Cu-Indo 0.25 g/kg | 5 | 93.01 | ||
| Cu-Indo 0.5 g/kg | 5 | 93.96 | ||
| Indomethacin 1 g/kg | 5 | 106.43 | ||
| Induced osteoarthritis (untreated) | 5 | |||
| Significance | 0.757 | 0.251 | 0.062 | |
Notes: Means for groups in homogeneous subsets at 5% level of significance are displayed.
Uses harmonic mean sample size =5.000. The bold figures represent significantly different means.
Abbreviations: Cu-Indo, copper indomethacin; HSD, honest significant difference; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha.
Tukey HSD for intergroup comparisons of percentage edema
| Week and treatment group | N | Subset for alpha =0.05
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | ||
| At week 1 | |||
| Cu-Indo 1 g/kg | 5 | ||
| Indomethacin 1 g/kg | 5 | 16.81 | 16.81 |
| Cu-Indo 0.5 g/kg | 5 | 16.90 | 16.90 |
| Cu-Indo 0.25 g/kg | 5 | 16.91 | 16.91 |
| Induced osteoarthritis (not treated) | 5 | ||
| Significance | 0.99 | 0.067 | |
| At week 2 | |||
| Cu-Indo 0.25 g/kg | 5 | 16.128 | |
| Cu-Indo 1 g/kg | 5 | 16.168 | |
| Cu-Indo 0.5 g/kg | 5 | 16.872 | |
| Indomethacin 1 g/kg | 5 | 18.8743 | |
| Induced osteoarthritis (not treated) | 5 | ||
| Significance | 0.642 | 1.00 | |
| At week 3 | |||
| Cu-Indo 1 g/kg | 5 | 17.99 | |
| Cu-Indo 0.5 g/kg | 5 | 18.14 | |
| Cu-Indo 0.25 g/kg | 5 | 18.86 | |
| Indomethacin 1 g/kg | 5 | 19.82 | |
| Induced osteoarthritis (not treated) | 5 | ||
| Significance | 0.84 | 1.00 | |
| At week 4 | |||
| Cu-Indo 0.5 g/kg | 5 | 16.595 | |
| Cu-Indo 1 g/kg | 5 | 17.31 | |
| Indomethacin 1 g/kg | 5 | 17.54 | |
| Cu-Indo 0.25 g/kg | 5 | 19.438 | |
| Induced osteoarthritis (not treated) | 5 | ||
| Significance | 0.324 | 1.00 | |
Notes: Means for groups in homogeneous subsets at 5% significance level are displayed. The bold figures represent significantly different means.
Abbreviations: Cu-Indo, copper indomethacin; HSD, honest significant difference.
Tukey HSD for intergroup comparisons of rotation in seconds at week 1
| Treatment group | N | Subset for alpha =0.05
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | ||
| Cu-Indo 0.5 g/kg | 5 | 127.20 | |
| Cu-Indo 1 g/kg | 5 | 135.20 | |
| Induced osteoarthritis (not treated) | 5 | 137.40 | |
| Indomethacin 1 g/kg | 5 | 152.20 | 152.20 |
| Cu-Indo 0.25 g/kg | 5 | ||
| Significance | 0.174 | 0.476 | |
Note: The bold figure represent a significantly different mean.
Abbreviations: Cu-Indo, copper indomethacin; HSD, honest significant difference.
Tukey HSD for intergroup comparisons of rotation in seconds at week 3
| Treatment group | N | Subset for alpha = 0.05
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Induced osteoarthritis (not treated) | 5 | |||
| Cu-Indo 1 g/kg | 5 | 136.00 | 136.00 | |
| Cu-Indo 0.5 g/kg | 5 | 139.00 | 139.00 | |
| Indomethacin 1 g/kg | 5 | 150.40 | ||
| Cu-Indo 0.25 g/kg | 5 | |||
| Significance | 0.282 | 0.483 | 0.244 | |
Notes: Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. The bold figures represent significantly different means.
Abbreviations: Cu-Indo, copper indomethacin; HSD, honest significant difference.
Figure 1Photomicrograph of a knee joint from a control rat showing the normal structure of this joint. The upper surface of the cartilage is smooth, the chondroblasts (near the upper surface) are small and flattened, and the chondrocytes (below) are rounded, large, and enclosed in lacunae (H&E stain, ×100).
Abbreviation: H&E, Haematoxylin & Eosin.
Figure 8Photomicrograph of a knee joint from a rat treated with Cu indomethacin gel in a dose of 1 g/kg, showing discontinuity of the upper smooth surface of the cartilage at many places (arrow), although the synovial space is of normal width and the thickness of the cartilage is more or less normal (H&E stain, ×100).
Abbreviation: H&E, Haematoxylin & Eosin.
Tukey HSD for intergroup comparisons of rotation in seconds at week 2
| Treatment group | N | Subset for alpha =0.05
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | ||
| Cu-Indo 0.5 g/kg | 5 | 138.000 | |
| Cu-Indo 1 g/kg | 5 | 141.600 | |
| Induced osteoarthritis (not treated) | 5 | 142.400 | |
| Indomethacin 1 g/kg | 5 | 147.900 | 147.900 |
| Cu-Indo 0.25 g/kg | 5 | ||
| Significance | 0.218 | 0.252 | |
Note: The bold figure represent a significantly different mean.
Abbreviations: Cu-Indo, copper indomethacin; HSD, honest significant difference.