Literature DB >> 25792575

Cesarean scar pregnancies: experience of 60 cases.

Ilan E Timor-Tritsch1, Nizar Khatib2, Ana Monteagudo2, Joanne Ramos2, Robert Berg2, Sándor Kovács2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the management, clinical courses, and outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancies diagnosed in the first trimester.
METHODS: We identified 60 cases of cesarean scar pregnancies diagnosed between 5 and 14 weeks. Group A contained 48 patients with fetal/embryonic cardiac activity; group B comprised 12 patients without cardiac activity; and group C included 11 patients with cardiac activity who chose expectant management.
RESULTS: Five of the 48 patients (10.4%) in group A were successfully treated for vaginal bleeding. Thirty-three (68.7%) received methotrexate injections, and all had full resolution. Three (6.3%) required uterine artery embolization for late-developing arteriovenous malformations. Ten of the 12 patients (83.3%) in group B were managed expectantly and had full recovery. Two of the 10 (20.0%) had arteriovenous malformations; 1 had unsuccessful uterine artery embolization followed by a hysterectomy, and the second requested a hysterectomy. Ten of the 11 patients (90.9%) in group C continued the pregnancies. One declined local injection. Four of the 10 (40.0%) delivered live offspring by successive elective cesarean deliveries. Three (30.0%) had hysterectomies for placenta percreta, and 1 did not have a hysterectomy after delivery. Five (50%) had second-trimester complications, all leading to hysterectomies. Of the 60 patients, 20 (33.3%) had serious complications: 5 had arteriovenous malformations; 4 had uterine artery embolization; and 11 had hysterectomies.
CONCLUSIONS: A cesarean scar pregnancy is a serious complication for patients who have had cesarean deliveries. Counseling, treatment, and follow-up are challenging for patients and caregivers. However, emerging data from different management approaches confirm that a cesarean scar pregnancy may progress and result in a live neonate at the expense of further fertility. This study confirmed that expectant management of a cesarean scar pregnancy is associated with a high risk of hysterectomy due to morbidly adherent placenta.
© 2015 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean delivery; cesarean scar; cesarean scar pregnancy; obstetric ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25792575     DOI: 10.7863/ultra.34.4.601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  23 in total

Review 1.  First-trimester emergencies: a radiologist's perspective.

Authors:  Catherine H Phillips; Jeremy R Wortman; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Aaron D Sodickson; Peter M Doubilet; Bharti Khurana
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-09-25

2.  Successful pregnancy located in a uterine cesarean scar: A case report.

Authors:  Shoko Tamada; Hisashi Masuyama; Jota Maki; Takeshi Eguchi; Takashi Mitsui; Eriko Eto; Kei Hayata; Yuji Hiramatsu
Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health       Date:  2017-03-23

Review 3.  Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Case Report and a Literature Review.

Authors:  George Valasoulis; Ioulia Magaliou; Dimitrios Koufidis; Antonios Garas; Alexandros Daponte
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 2.948

4.  Ectopic uterine scar pregnancy: A case report.

Authors:  M Sarthak Swarup; Anju Garg
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2020-07-08

5.  Conservative methotrexate treatment of a scar pregnancy case: adding evidence to the evidence.

Authors:  Claudia Ligorio; Ugo Indraccolo; Danila Morano; Pantaleo Greco
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-05-12

6.  Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by Artery Embolization Combined with Diode Laser: A Novel Approach for a Rare Disease.

Authors:  Felice Sorrentino; Vincenzo De Feo; Guglielmo Stabile; Raffaele Tinelli; Maurizio Nicola D'Alterio; Giuseppe Ricci; Stefano Angioni; Luigi Nappi
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Ying Long; Huili Zhu; Yuanyuan Hu; Licong Shen; Jing Fu; Wei Huang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-01

Review 8.  Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a review.

Authors:  Danielle M Panelli; Catherine H Phillips; Paula C Brady
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2015-10-15

9.  New ultrasound grading system for cesarean scar pregnancy and its implications for management strategies: An observational cohort study.

Authors:  Shin-Yu Lin; Chia-Jung Hsieh; Yi-An Tu; Yi-Ping Li; Chien-Nan Lee; Wen-Wei Hsu; Jin-Chung Shih
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Value of Crossover Sign in Anticipating Under-8-week Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treatment by Foley Insertion Combined with Suction Curettage in Vietnam.

Authors:  Tuan Minh Vo; Hoang T Dinh; Thong P Van; Christopher Son Nguyen
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2021-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.