Literature DB >> 25792461

Cystadenomas of the liver and extrahepatic bile ducts: Morphologic and immunohistochemical characterization of the biliary and intestinal variants.

Jorge Albores-Saavedra1, Juan Carlos Córdova-Ramón2, Fredy Chablé-Montero3, Rita Dorantes-Heredia3, Donald E Henson4.   

Abstract

Cystadenomas of the liver and extrahepatic bile ducts (EHBD) are uncommon but distinctive neoplasms whose terminology and epithelial phenotype have been a source of controversy. We reviewed 20 cases, 16 arising in the liver and 4 in the EHBD. Eighteen patients were women, with a mean age of 36.5 years. Eighteen tumors were multiloculated and 2 were unilocular. The tumor size ranged from 4 to 29 cm (average, 11 cm). The cyst fluid in 13 tumors was described as serous, in 2 as clear, in 2 others as hemorrhagic, and in 1 as serous and mucinous. Only in 2 tumors was the fluid described as mucinous. In 18 cystadenomas, the predominant epithelial lining consisted of a single layer of cuboidal or low-columnar nondysplastic cells similar to those of the gallbladder or bile ducts. This epithelial lining was strongly positive for cytokeratins 7 and 19, and focally positive for MUC1. Only 2 cystadenomas showed predominant intestinal differentiation characterized by mature goblet cells and columnar absorptive cells. These cells expressed CDX2, MUC2, and cytokeratin 20. Admixed with the goblet and columnar cells, there were serotonin-containing cells and Paneth cells. These 2 tumors showed extensive areas of high-grade dysplasia and invasive adenocarcinoma with intestinal phenotype. A subepithelial ovarian-like stroma was present in all tumors. None of the patients died of the tumors. We believe that the term mucinous cystic tumor recommended by the World Health Organization for all cystadenomas of the liver and EHBD is a misnomer.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biliary phenotype; Cystadenoma of the liver and extrahepatic bile ducts; High-grade dysplasia; Intestinal phenotype; Intestinal type; Invasive adenocarcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25792461     DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol        ISSN: 1092-9134            Impact factor:   2.090


  5 in total

1.  Mucin-producing Cystic Hepatobiliary Neoplasms: Updated Nomenclature and Clinical, Pathologic, and Imaging Features.

Authors:  Matthew H Lee; Venkata S Katabathina; Meghan G Lubner; Hardik U Shah; Srinivasa R Prasad; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 2.  Cystic biliary tumors of the liver: diagnostic criteria and common pitfalls.

Authors:  Susan Shyu; Aatur D Singhi
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.526

3.  Intrahepatic biliary cystadenoma mimicking hydatid cyst of liver: a clinicopathologic study of six cases.

Authors:  Zubair Ahmad; Nasir Uddin; Wasim Memon; Jamshid Abdul-Ghafar; Arsalan Ahmed
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-10

4.  Differentiation and management of hepatobiliary mucinous cystic neoplasms: a single centre experience for 8 years.

Authors:  Jiaqi Gao; Junhao Zheng; Jingwei Cai; Mubarak Ali Kirih; Junjie Xu; Liye Tao; Yuelong Liang; Xu Feng; Jing Fang; Xiao Liang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 5.  Benign biliary neoplasms and biliary tumor precursors.

Authors:  Samantha Sarcognato; Diana Sacchi; Matteo Fassan; Luca Fabris; Massimiliano Cadamuro; Giacomo Zanus; Ivana Cataldo; Claudia Covelli; Paola Capelli; Alberto Furlanetto; Maria Guido
Journal:  Pathologica       Date:  2021-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.