Literature DB >> 25792291

Methoxetamine, a ketamine derivative, produced conditioned place preference and was self-administered by rats: Evidence of its abuse potential.

Chrislean Jun Botanas1, June Bryan de la Peña1, Irene Joy Dela Peña1, Reinholdgher Tampus1, Robin Yoon1, Hee Jin Kim1, Yong Sup Lee2, Choon Gon Jang3, Jae Hoon Cheong4.   

Abstract

Methoxetamine (MXE) is an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that is chemically and pharmacologically similar to ketamine. Recently, there have been many reports regarding its use/misuse in humans which have resulted in serious or even fatal outcomes. Despite these reports, MXE is not controlled or regulated in many countries which may be partly due to the lack of scientific evidence regarding its abuse potential. Thus, in the present study we evaluated the abuse potential (rewarding and reinforcing effects) of MXE through the conditioned place preference (CPP) and self-administration (SA) tests in Sprague-Dawley rats. In addition, locomotor activity during the conditioning phase of the CPP was also analyzed. Ketamine was used as a reference drug. MXE (2.5 and 5mg/kg) induced significant CPP in rats, an effect comparable to that of ketamine (5mg/kg). Interestingly, MXE did not produce any locomotor alterations while ketamine decreased the locomotor activity of rats. In the SA test, rats showed modest self-administration of MXE (0.25, 0.5, 1.0mg/kg/infusion), while ketamine (0.5mg/kg/infusion) was robustly self-administered. These results demonstrate that MXE, similar to ketamine, has rewarding and reinforcing effects in rats. The present study strongly suggests that MXE has a potential for human abuse. In addition, the discrepant effects of MXE and ketamine on locomotor activity and rate of self-administration propose that the psychopharmacological effects of these drugs may diverge in some aspects. More importantly, this study advocates the careful monitoring and prompt regulation of MXE and its related substances.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Addiction; Conditioned place preference; Designer drugs; Ketamine; Methoxetamine; Self-administration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25792291     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  21 in total

1.  Methoxetamine affects brain processing involved in emotional response in rats.

Authors:  M T Zanda; P Fadda; S Antinori; M Di Chio; W Fratta; C Chiamulera; L Fattore
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  The novel ketamine analog methoxetamine produces dissociative-like behavioral effects in rodents.

Authors:  Adam L Halberstadt; Natalia Slepak; James Hyun; Mahalah R Buell; Susan B Powell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Ketamine: The final frontier or another depressing end?

Authors:  Omar K Sial; Eric M Parise; Lyonna F Parise; Tamara Gnecco; Carlos A Bolaños-Guzmán
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Phencyclidine-like in vivo effects of methoxetamine in mice and rats.

Authors:  Michael D Berquist; William S Hyatt; Jonathan Bauer-Erickson; Brenda M Gannon; Andrew P Norwood; William E Fantegrossi
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 5.250

5.  Locomotor sensitization to intermittent ketamine administration is associated with nucleus accumbens plasticity in male and female rats.

Authors:  C E Strong; K J Schoepfer; A M Dossat; S K Saland; K N Wright; M Kabbaj
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  Effects of ketamine on the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor activity of preadolescent and adolescent rats: impact of age, sex, and drug dose.

Authors:  Sanders A McDougall; Andrea E Moran; Timothy J Baum; Matthew G Apodaca; Vanessa Real
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Reinforcing properties of an intermittent, low dose of ketamine in rats: effects of sex and cycle.

Authors:  Katherine N Wright; Caroline E Strong; Marjorie N Addonizio; Naomi C Brownstein; Mohamed Kabbaj
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Overlap in the neural circuitry and molecular mechanisms underlying ketamine abuse and its use as an antidepressant.

Authors:  Saurabh S Kokane; Ross J Armant; Carlos A Bolaños-Guzmán; Linda I Perrotti
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The ketamine-like compound methoxetamine substitutes for ketamine in the self-administration paradigm and enhances mesolimbic dopaminergic transmission.

Authors:  Anna Mutti; Sonia Aroni; Paola Fadda; Laura Padovani; Laura Mancini; Roberto Collu; Anna Lisa Muntoni; Liana Fattore; Cristiano Chiamulera
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Depression in chronic ketamine users: Sex differences and neural bases.

Authors:  Chiang-Shan R Li; Sheng Zhang; Chia-Chun Hung; Chun-Ming Chen; Jeng-Ren Duann; Ching-Po Lin; Tony Szu-Hsien Lee
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.376

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.