Julia B Pitcher1, Sebastian H Doeltgen2, Mitchell R Goldsworthy2, Luke A Schneider2, Ann-Maree Vallence2, Ashleigh E Smith2, John G Semmler3, Michelle N McDonnell4, Michael C Ridding2. 1. Robinson Research Institute, School of Paediatrics & Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia. Electronic address: julia.pitcher@adelaide.edu.au. 2. Robinson Research Institute, School of Paediatrics & Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia. 3. Discipline of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia. 4. School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Two commonly-used methods for setting stimulus intensities in transcranial magnetic brain stimulation studies were compared to determine which best approximated a motor evoked potential (MEP) of 50% of the maximal MEP amplitude (SI50); a suprathreshold intensity relative to resting motor threshold (rMT) or adjusting the intensity to evoke an MEP amplitude of 1mV. METHODS: Corticomotor stimulus-response curves and rMT for the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of 176 subjects (aged 10-74 years) were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Regardless of subject age or sex, SI50 occurred at 127.5 ± 11.3% rMT. Except in young children, MEPs of 1 mV were significantly smaller than those evoked at SI50. CONCLUSIONS: In the inactive FDI muscle, a stimulus intensity of 127-128% rMT consistently gives the best approximation of SI50 in most subjects, except perhaps young children. SIGNIFICANCE: Setting TMS stimulus intensities relative to rMT provides a less variable inter-subject comparator, with respect to individual differences in corticomotor input-output characteristics, than adjusting the stimulator output to give an absolute MEP magnitude.
OBJECTIVES: Two commonly-used methods for setting stimulus intensities in transcranial magnetic brain stimulation studies were compared to determine which best approximated a motor evoked potential (MEP) of 50% of the maximal MEP amplitude (SI50); a suprathreshold intensity relative to resting motor threshold (rMT) or adjusting the intensity to evoke an MEP amplitude of 1mV. METHODS: Corticomotor stimulus-response curves and rMT for the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of 176 subjects (aged 10-74 years) were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Regardless of subject age or sex, SI50 occurred at 127.5 ± 11.3% rMT. Except in young children, MEPs of 1 mV were significantly smaller than those evoked at SI50. CONCLUSIONS: In the inactive FDI muscle, a stimulus intensity of 127-128% rMT consistently gives the best approximation of SI50 in most subjects, except perhaps young children. SIGNIFICANCE: Setting TMS stimulus intensities relative to rMT provides a less variable inter-subject comparator, with respect to individual differences in corticomotor input-output characteristics, than adjusting the stimulator output to give an absolute MEP magnitude.
Authors: Hamidollah Hassanlouei; Christopher W Sundberg; Ashleigh E Smith; Andrew Kuplic; Sandra K Hunter Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2017-05-11
Authors: Daniel T Corp; Hannah G K Bereznicki; Gillian M Clark; George J Youssef; Peter J Fried; Ali Jannati; Charlotte B Davies; Joyce Gomes-Osman; Julie Stamm; Sung Wook Chung; Steven J Bowe; Nigel C Rogasch; Paul B Fitzgerald; Giacomo Koch; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Peter G Enticott Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Jago M Van Dam; Amy J Garrett; Luke A Schneider; Nicolette A Hodyl; Mitchell R Goldsworthy; Suzette Coat; Janet A Rowan; William M Hague; Julia B Pitcher Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 8.143
Authors: Claire Kemlin; Eric Moulton; Sara Leder; Marion Houot; Sabine Meunier; Charlotte Rosso; Jean-Charles Lamy Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 4.003