| Literature DB >> 25791957 |
Wei Zhang1, Na Liu2, Haigang Shi1, Jun Liu1, Lianxin Shi1, Bo Zhang2, Huaiyu Wang3, Junhui Ji1, Paul K Chu3.
Abstract
Positively-charged surfaces on implants have a similEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25791957 PMCID: PMC4366815 DOI: 10.1038/srep09369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Preparation procedures and surface characteristics of the positively-charged surface with tertiary amines.
(a) Schematic diagram illustrating the preparation procedure: (1) The pyrolytic carbon is formed on the PE substrate by argon plasma treatment (6.14 × 1015 ions/cm2) for 10 minutes to obtain the PAr sample and (2) The targeted nitrogen functionalities are generated by nitrogen PIII and the sample is designated as PArN. (b) Raman spectra of PE, PAr, and PArN, suggesting the formation of pyrolytic carbon structure after argon plasma treatment. (c) ATR-FTIR spectra of PE, PAr, and PArN. Some C = N and C≡N bonds are not detected at about 1650 cm−1 and 2230 cm−1. (d) Deconvoluted XPS spectra revealing that C = C, CN and CNO bonds are formed on PArN. (e) TOF-SIMS negative ion spectra of PE, PAr, and PArN, further showing CN-, CNO- and C3N- fragments attributable to C-N(C)-C and N-C = O, and but little C = N and C≡N. (f) KFM analysis showing the relative surface potential of PE, PAr, and PArN as follows: PE = 410 ± 12.2 mV; Par = 337 ± 12.5 mV, and PArN = 301 ± 7.7 mV.
Figure 2Effects of the positively-charged surface with tertiary amines on apoptosis and cell cycle of the BMSCs.
(a) Cell apoptosis and (b) Cell cycle of BMSCs cultured on blank, PE, PAr, and PArN at day 1 and day 3. The figures show the cell state for triplicate experiments and 10,000 cells are analyzed.
Figure 3Relationship between the positively-charged surface with tertiary amines and pre-inflammatory stimuli.
TNF-α expression of BMSCs on blank, PE, PAr and PArN at day 3 is measured by real time PCR, relative to the GAPDH expression and normalized to the TNF-α expression on blank, (**, p < 0.01) denote statistical significance compared to the blank group.
Figure 4Influence of the positively-charged surface with tertiary amines on calcification and bone-related genes/protein expressions of BMSCs.
(a) TOF-SIMS images of BMSs cultured for 7 days. The spectrum was the high-resolution TOF-SIMS spectra. (b) Ca ion levels normalized to the C5H9 fragment showing that there is higher Ca level on PArN than PAr and blank. The field of view is 200 μm × 200 μm. The figures show the TOF-SIMS images representative of three repeated analyses. (c) Expression levels of osteogenic markers (Runx-2, ALP, OCN, and BSP) of BMSCs at day 3 by real time PCR relative to GAPDH expression and normalized to the expressions by cells cultured on blank, showing PArN promotes osteogenic expression of BMSCs. (d) Runx-2 and OCN protein products of the cells cultured at day 7 by western blot analysis relative to β-actin, revealing PArN increases osteogenic protein products of BMSCs. (*, p < 0.05) and (**, p < 0.01) denote statistical significance compared to blank group.
Figure 5Influence of the positively-charged surface with tertiary amines on three NOS isoforms expressions in BMSCs.
Expressions of eNOS/nNOS/iNOS genes of BMSCs cultured on blank and PArN are measured by real time PCR relative to GAPDH expression and normalized to the expressions on Blank. The affected NOS genes exhibit a high iNOS expression level in the local biochemical and electric stimuli environment (PArN). (**) denote the statistical significance (p < 0.01) compared to blank, respectively.
Figure 6Osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs on the positively-charged surface with tertiary amines in the presence of the NOS inhibitor or siRNA-iNOS transfection.
Expressions of osteogenic markers (Runx-2, ALP, OCN, and BSP) of BMSCs cultured in the presence and absence of the NOS inhibitor or siRNA-iNOS transfection in the cell culture medium for 3 days are measured by real time PCR relative to GAPDH expression and normalized to the expressions on Blank without the NOS inhibitor and siRNA. (a) eNOS inhibitor (L-NAME). (b) nNOS inhibitor (Sper). (c) iNOS inhibitor (L-Can). (d) siRNA-iNOS transfection. The bottom left illustrates transfection of siRNA-iNOS with GFP gene into BMSCs and microscopic images of the cells before and after siRNA transfection. (*) and (**) denote two statistical significance (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01), respectively, compared to the sample without NOS inhibitors and siRNA.
Figure 7Mechanical illustration of the positively-charged surface with tertiary amines upregulating osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs via the iNOS pathway signaled by the surface charge.
Primer Sequences for real time PCR
| Gene | Primers (F - forward, R - reverse) |
|---|---|
| ALP | F: 5′-ACAGTGACAGCTGCCCGCAT-3′ |
| R: 5′-TTGCATCGCGTGCGCTCAGT-3′ | |
| BSP | F: 5′-AGACCATGCAGAGAGCGAG-3′ |
| R: 5′-ACGTCTGCTTGTGTGCTGG-3′ | |
| RUNX-2 | F: 5′-AGGGCGCATTCCTCATCCCAGT-3′ |
| R: 5′-AAGACAGCGGCGTGGTGGAA-3′ | |
| OCN | F: 5′-TGGCACCACCGTTTAGGGCA-3′ |
| R: 5′-TTTGGAGCAGCTGTGCCGTC-3′ | |
| nNOS | F: 5′-TGAGGTTCTCAGTGTTCGGC-3′ |
| R: 5′- ATCCTCTCCCCTCCCAGTTC-3′ | |
| eNOS | F: 5′- CAAAAGGCACAGGCATCACC-3′ |
| R: 5′- AAGGCCTCATGCTCTAGGGA-3′ | |
| iNOS | F: 5′- ACGGAAGAGACGCACAGGCA-3′ |
| R: 5′- AAGGCAGCAGGCACACGCAA-3′ | |
| TNF-α | F: 5′- ACCTGGCCTCTCTACCTTGT-3′ |
| R: 5′- GACCCGTAGGGCGATTACAG-3′ | |
| GAPDH | F: 5′- GGCACAGTCAAGGCTGAGAATG-3′ |
| R: 5′- ATGGTGGTGAAGACGCCAGTA-3 |