Literature DB >> 25791753

Body mass index was associated with upstaging and upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer who met the inclusion criteria for active surveillance.

Ottavio de Cobelli1, Daniela Terracciano2, Elena Tagliabue3, Sara Raimondi3, Giacomo Galasso1, Antonio Cioffi1, Giovanni Cordima1, Gennaro Musi1, Rocco Damiano4, Francesco Cantiello4, Serena Detti1, Deliu Victor Matei1, Danilo Bottero1, Giuseppe Renne5, Matteo Ferro6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with an increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer (PCa). The effect of body mass index (BMI) as a predictor of progression in men with low-risk PCa has been only poorly assessed. In this study, we evaluated the association of BMI with progression in patients with low-risk PCa who met the inclusion criteria for the active surveillance (AS) protocol.
METHODS: We assessed 311 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and were eligible for AS according to the following criteria: clinical stage T2a or less, prostate-specific antigen level < 10 ng/ml, 2 or fewer cores involved with cancer, Gleason score ≤ 6 grade, and prostate-specific antigen density < 0.2 ng/ml/cc. Reclassification was defined as upstaged (pathological stage > pT2) and upgraded (Gleason score ≥ 7; primary Gleason pattern 4) disease. Seminal vesicle invasion, positive lymph nodes, and tumor volume ≥ 0.5 ml were also recorded.
RESULTS: We found that high BMI was significantly associated with upgrading, upstaging, and seminal vesicle invasion, whereas it was not associated with positive lymph nodes or large tumor volume. At multivariate analysis, 1 unit increase of BMI significantly increased the risk of upgrading, upstaging, seminal vesicle invasion, and any outcome by 21%, 23%, 27%, and 20%, respectively. The differences between areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves comparing models with and without BMI were statistically significant for upgrading (P = 0.0002), upstaging (P = 0.0007), and any outcome (P = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: BMI should be a selection criterion for inclusion of patients with low-risk PCa in AS programs. Our results support the idea that obesity is associated with worse prognosis and suggest that a close AS program is an appropriate treatment option for obese subjects.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Body mass index; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25791753     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  26 in total

Review 1.  Obesity and Prostate Cancer: A Focused Update on Active Surveillance, Race, and Molecular Subtyping.

Authors:  Adriana C Vidal; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Randomized trial evaluating the role of weight loss in overweight and obese men with early stage prostate Cancer on active surveillance: Rationale and design of the Prostate Cancer Active Lifestyle Study (PALS).

Authors:  Jeannette M Schenk; Marian L Neuhouser; Sarah J Beatty; Matthew VanDoren; Daniel W Lin; Michael Porter; John L Gore; Roman Gulati; Stephen R Plymate; Jonathan L Wright
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 3.  The emerging role of obesity, diet and lipid metabolism in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matteo Ferro; Daniela Terracciano; Carlo Buonerba; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Danilo Bottero; Sisto Perdonà; Riccardo Autorino; Alessandro Serino; Francesco Cantiello; Rocco Damiano; Iulia Andras; Sabino De Placido; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Michele Battaglia; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Vincenzo Mirone; Ottavio De Cobelli
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.404

4.  CXCL1 mediates obesity-associated adipose stromal cell trafficking and function in the tumour microenvironment.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Chieh Tseng; Yan Zhang; Olga Sirin; Paul G Corn; Elsa M Li-Ning-Tapia; Patricia Troncoso; John Davis; Curtis Pettaway; John Ward; Marsha L Frazier; Christopher Logothetis; Mikhail G Kolonin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  The presence of primary circulating prostate cells is associated with upgrading and upstaging in patients eligible for active surveillance.

Authors:  Nigel P Murray; Eduardo Reyes; Cynthia Fuentealba; Socrates Aedo; Omar Jacob
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2017-01-10

6.  Clinical Significance of Serum Adipokines according to Body Mass Index in Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Minyong Kang; Seok Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee; Sung Kyu Hong
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.400

Review 7.  Exercise overcome adverse effects among prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy: An update meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gao Yunfeng; He Weiyang; He Xueyang; Huang Yilong; Gou Xin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Sclerostin-Neutralizing Antibody Treatment Rescues Negative Effects of Rosiglitazone on Mouse Bone Parameters.

Authors:  Mariah Farrell; Heather Fairfield; Samantha Costa; Anastasia D'Amico; Carolyne Falank; Daniel J Brooks; Michaela R Reagan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Low serum testosterone predicts upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yuan Gao; Chen-Yi Jiang; Shi-Kui Mao; Di Cui; Kui-Yuan Hao; Wei Zhao; Qi Jiang; Yuan Ruan; Shu-Jie Xia; Bang-Min Han
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Nomograms for predicting Gleason upgrading in a contemporary Chinese cohort receiving radical prostatectomy after extended prostate biopsy: development and internal validation.

Authors:  Biming He; Rui Chen; Xu Gao; Shancheng Ren; Bo Yang; Jianguo Hou; Linhui Wang; Qing Yang; Tie Zhou; Lin Zhao; Chuanliang Xu; Yinghao Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.