Andy de Oliveira Vicente 1 , Sujana S Chandrasekhar 2 , Helio K Yamashita 3 , Oswaldo Laercio M Cruz 3 , Flavia A Barros 3 , Norma O Penido 3 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Show RCT »
Hide RCT «
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the applicability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI ) as a method for monitoring the activity of otospongiotic lesions before and after clinical treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. SETTING: One single tertiary care institution in a large, cosmopolitan city. METHODS: Twenty-six patients (n = 42 ears) with clinical, audiometric, and tomographic diagnosis of otosclerosis were enrolled . If computed tomography (CT ) demonstrated active lesions, these patients underwent MRI to detect otospongiotic foci, seen as areas of gadolinium enhancement. Patients were divided into 3 groups and received treatment with placebo, sodium alendronate, or sodium fluoride for 6 months. After this period, clinical and audiometric evaluations and a second MRI were performed. Each MRI was evaluated by both a neuroradiologist and an otolaryngologist in a subjective (visual) and objective (using specific eFilm Workstation software) manner. RESULTS: Otospongiosis was most predominantly identified in the region anterior to the oval window, and this site was reliable for comparing pre- and posttreatment scans. The patients in the alendronate and sodium fluoride groups had MRI findings that suggested a decrease in activity of otospongiotic lesions , more relevant in the alendronate group. These findings were statistically significant for both subjective and objective MRI evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: MRI shows higher sensitivity than clinical or audiometric assessment for detecting reduction in activity of otospongiosis . The objective MRI evaluation based on software analysis was the most accurate method of monitoring clinical treatment response in otospongiosis . © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2015.
RCT Entities: Population
Interventions
Outcomes
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the applicability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a method for monitoring the activity of otospongiotic lesions before and after clinical treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. SETTING: One single tertiary care institution in a large, cosmopolitan city. METHODS: Twenty-six patients (n = 42 ears) with clinical, audiometric, and tomographic diagnosis of otosclerosis were enrolled. If computed tomography (CT) demonstrated active lesions, these patients underwent MRI to detect otospongiotic foci , seen as areas of gadolinium enhancement. Patients were divided into 3 groups and received treatment with placebo, sodium alendronate , or sodium fluoride for 6 months. After this period, clinical and audiometric evaluations and a second MRI were performed. Each MRI was evaluated by both a neuroradiologist and an otolaryngologist in a subjective (visual) and objective (using specific eFilm Workstation software) manner. RESULTS: Otospongiosis was most predominantly identified in the region anterior to the oval window, and this site was reliable for comparing pre- and posttreatment scans. The patients in the alendronate and sodium fluoride groups had MRI findings that suggested a decrease in activity of otospongiotic lesions , more relevant in the alendronate group. These findings were statistically significant for both subjective and objective MRI evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: MRI shows higher sensitivity than clinical or audiometric assessment for detecting reduction in activity of otospongiosis . The objective MRI evaluation based on software analysis was the most accurate method of monitoring clinical treatment response in otospongiosis . © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2015.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Species
Keywords:
hearing loss; magnetic resonance imaging; otosclerosis; otospongiosis; sodium alendronate; sodium fluoride
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2015
PMID: 25791707 DOI: 10.1177/0194599815574698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ISSN: 0194-5998 Impact factor: 3.497