| Literature DB >> 25791198 |
Mark A Feger1, John Goetschius2, Hailey Love3, Sue A Saliba4, Jay Hertel5.
Abstract
The purpose of this systematic review was to assess whether electrical stimulation (ES), when used in conjunction with a standard treatment, can reduce levels of functional impairment, edema, and pain compared to a standard treatment alone, in patients following a lateral ankle sprain. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, SportDiscus, and Medline (OVID) databases through June 2014 using the terms "ankle sprain or ankle sprains or ligament injury or ligamentous injury," and "electric stimulation or electric stimulation or electrotherapy." Our search identified four randomized control trials, of which, neuromuscular ES and high-voltage pulsed stimulation were the only two ES modalities utilized. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cohen's d for comparison between treatment groups. Three of four effect sizes for function had 95% CI that crossed zero. Twenty-four of the thirty-two effect sizes for edema had 95% CI that crossed zero. All effect sizes for pain had 95% CI that crossed zero. Therefore, the use of ES is not recommended as a means to improve function, reduce edema, or decrease pain in the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains.Entities:
Keywords: Patient outcomes; Swelling; Therapeutic modalities
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25791198 DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.01.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Phys Ther Sport ISSN: 1466-853X Impact factor: 2.365