Angela J Jacques-Tiura1, Antonia Abbey, Rhiana Wegner, Jennifer Pierce, Sheri E Pegram, Jacqueline Woerner. 1. Angela J. Jacques-Tiura is with the Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI. Antonia Abbey, Jennifer Pierce, Sheri E. Pegram, and Jacqueline Woerner are with the Department of Psychology, Wayne State University. At the time of the study, Rhiana Wegner was with the Department of Psychology, Wayne State University.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We extended past research on sexual violence etiology by examining the impact of perceived pressure to have sex by any means and the types of objectifying and egalitarian language that friends used when discussing women. METHODS: We examined a community sample of young single men interested in dating women (n = 423) who completed audio computer-assisted self-interviews at baseline (spring/summer 2008) and 1 year later (spring/summer 2009). We used hierarchical logistic regression analyses that controlled for baseline sexual aggression. RESULTS: Approximately one quarter of participants (n = 108) reported that they made a woman engage in some type of sexual activity during the past year when they knew she was unwilling or unable to consent. Past-year perpetrators perceived more pressure from their friends to have sex by any means, felt less comfortable with their friends making egalitarian statements about women, and used more objectifying statements when describing how their friends talked about women compared with nonperpetrators. Seventy-eight percent of men were correctly classified by these predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Men's discussions with each other about women could foster an environment that encourages or discourages sexual violence. We discussed future research and prevention implications.
OBJECTIVES: We extended past research on sexual violence etiology by examining the impact of perceived pressure to have sex by any means and the types of objectifying and egalitarian language that friends used when discussing women. METHODS: We examined a community sample of young single men interested in dating women (n = 423) who completed audio computer-assisted self-interviews at baseline (spring/summer 2008) and 1 year later (spring/summer 2009). We used hierarchical logistic regression analyses that controlled for baseline sexual aggression. RESULTS: Approximately one quarter of participants (n = 108) reported that they made a woman engage in some type of sexual activity during the past year when they knew she was unwilling or unable to consent. Past-year perpetrators perceived more pressure from their friends to have sex by any means, felt less comfortable with their friends making egalitarian statements about women, and used more objectifying statements when describing how their friends talked about women compared with nonperpetrators. Seventy-eight percent of men were correctly classified by these predictors. CONCLUSIONS:Men's discussions with each other about women could foster an environment that encourages or discourages sexual violence. We discussed future research and prevention implications.
Authors: Ann L Coker; Patricia G Cook-Craig; Corrine M Williams; Bonnie S Fisher; Emily R Clear; Lisandra S Garcia; Lea M Hegge Journal: Violence Against Women Date: 2011-06-02