Matt Jans1, Joseph Viana, David Grant, Susan D Cochran, Annie C Lee, Ninez A Ponce. 1. Matt Jans, Joseph Viana, David Grant, and Ninez A. Ponce are with the California Health Interview Survey, UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles. Susan D. Cochran is with the Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health. Annie C. Lee is with the Department of Sociology, UCLA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We explored changes in sexual orientation question item completion in a large statewide health survey. METHODS: We used 2003 to 2011 California Health Interview Survey data to investigate sexual orientation item nonresponse and sexual minority self-identification trends in a cross-sectional sample representing the noninstitutionalized California household population aged 18 to 70 years (n = 182 812 adults). RESULTS: Asians, Hispanics, limited-English-proficient respondents, and those interviewed in non-English languages showed the greatest declines in sexual orientation item nonresponse. Asian women, regardless of English-proficiency status, had the highest odds of item nonresponse. Spanish interviews produced more nonresponse than English interviews and Asian-language interviews produced less nonresponse when we controlled for demographic factors and survey cycle. Sexual minority self-identification increased in concert with the item nonresponse decline. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual orientation nonresponse declines and the increase in sexual minority identification suggest greater acceptability of sexual orientation assessment in surveys. Item nonresponse rate convergence among races/ethnicities, language proficiency groups, and interview languages shows that sexual orientation can be measured in surveys of diverse populations.
OBJECTIVES: We explored changes in sexual orientation question item completion in a large statewide health survey. METHODS: We used 2003 to 2011 California Health Interview Survey data to investigate sexual orientation item nonresponse and sexual minority self-identification trends in a cross-sectional sample representing the noninstitutionalized California household population aged 18 to 70 years (n = 182 812 adults). RESULTS: Asians, Hispanics, limited-English-proficient respondents, and those interviewed in non-English languages showed the greatest declines in sexual orientation item nonresponse. Asian women, regardless of English-proficiency status, had the highest odds of item nonresponse. Spanish interviews produced more nonresponse than English interviews and Asian-language interviews produced less nonresponse when we controlled for demographic factors and survey cycle. Sexual minority self-identification increased in concert with the item nonresponse decline. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual orientation nonresponse declines and the increase in sexual minority identification suggest greater acceptability of sexual orientation assessment in surveys. Item nonresponse rate convergence among races/ethnicities, language proficiency groups, and interview languages shows that sexual orientation can be measured in surveys of diverse populations.
Authors: Kenneth H Mayer; Judith B Bradford; Harvey J Makadon; Ron Stall; Hilary Goldhammer; Stewart Landers Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Julia A Dilley; Katrina Wynkoop Simmons; Michael J Boysun; Barbara A Pizacani; Mike J Stark Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-08-20 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Michael King; Joanna Semlyen; Sharon See Tai; Helen Killaspy; David Osborn; Dmitri Popelyuk; Irwin Nazareth Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2008-08-18 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Stuart Michaels; Carolina Milesi; Michael Stern; Melissa Heim Viox; Heather Morrison; Paul Guerino; Christina N Dragon; Samuel C Haffer Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Marc N Elliott; James M Dahlhamer; Sarah MacCarthy; Megan K Beckett; Nate Orr; Paul Guerino; Denis Agniel; Catherine L Saunders; Mark A Schuster; Judy H Ng; Steven C Martino Journal: Med Care Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Tara M Rutter; Annesa Flentje; James W Dilley; Suzanne Barakat; Nancy H Liu; Margaret S Gross; Ricardo F Muñoz; Yan Leykin Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 4.839