Literature DB >> 25789965

Frequency of convergence and accommodative disorders in a clinical population of Mashhad, Iran.

Seyed Hosein Hoseini-Yazdi1, AbbasAli Yekta, Hosein Nouri, Javad Heravian, Hadi Ostadimoghaddam, Mehdi Khabazkhoob.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the frequency of convergence and accommodation anomalies in an optometric clinical setting in Mashhad, Iran, and to determine tests with highest accuracy in diagnosing these anomalies.
METHODS: From 261 patients who came to the optometric clinics of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences during a month, 83 of them were included in the study based on the inclusion criteria. Near point of convergence (NPC), near and distance heterophoria, monocular and binocular accommodative facility (MAF and BAF, respectively), lag of accommodation, positive and negative fusional vergences (PFV and NFV, respectively), AC/A ratio, relative accommodation, and amplitude of accommodation (AA) were measured to diagnose the convergence and accommodation anomalies. The results were also compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The accuracy of these tests was explored using sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+, LR-).
RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 21.3 ± 3.5 years and 14.5% of them had specific binocular and accommodative symptoms. Convergence and accommodative anomalies were found in 19.3% of the patients; accommodative excess (4.8%) and convergence insufficiency (3.6%) were the most common accommodative and convergence disorders, respectively. Symptomatic patients showed lower values for BAF (p = .003), MAF (p = .001), as well as AA (p = .001) compared with asymptomatic patients. Moreover, BAF (S = 75%, Sp = 62%) and MAF (S = 62%, Sp = 89%) were the most accurate tests for detecting accommodative and convergence disorders in terms of both sensitivity and specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: Convergence and accommodative anomalies are the most common binocular disorders in optometric patients. Including tests of monocular and binocular accommodative facility in routine eye examinations as accurate tests to diagnose these anomalies requires further investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accommodation; binocular vision; convergence; facility; symptoms

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25789965     DOI: 10.3109/09273972.2014.1002622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strabismus        ISSN: 0927-3972


  6 in total

1.  Characterization of Visual Symptomatology Associated with Refractive, Accommodative, and Binocular Anomalies.

Authors:  Pilar Cacho-Martínez; Mario Cantó-Cerdán; Stela Carbonell-Bonete; Ángel García-Muñoz
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  Characterizing Refractive Errors, Near Accommodative and Vergence Anomalies and Symptoms in an Optometry Clinic.

Authors:  Samuel O Wajuihian
Journal:  Br Ir Orthopt J       Date:  2022-07-14

Review 3.  Convergence insufficiency: Review of clinical diagnostic signs.

Authors:  Liat Gantz; Hadas Stiebel-Kalish
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2021-12-25

4.  Accommodative and binocular vision dysfunctions in a Portuguese clinical population.

Authors:  Sandra Franco; Alexandra Moreira; Ana Fernandes; António Baptista
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2021-11-28

5.  Prevalence of general binocular dysfunctions among rural schoolchildren in South Korea.

Authors:  Jung Un Jang; Inn-Jee Park
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-16

Review 6.  Near Points of Convergence and Accommodation in a Population of University Students in Iran.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Mojgan Pakbin; Babak Ali; Abbasali Yekta; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Amir Asharlous; Mohammadreza Aghamirsalim; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2019-07-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.