Literature DB >> 25789917

Screening magnetic resonance imaging recommendations and outcomes in patients at high risk for breast cancer.

Sima Ehsani1, Roberta M Strigel, Erica Pettke, Lee Wilke, Amye J Tevaarwerk, Wendy B DeMartini, Kari B Wisinski.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening recommendations and the subsequent outcomes in women with increased risk for breast cancer evaluated by oncology subspecialists at an academic center. Patients evaluated between 1/1/2007 and 3/1/2011 under diagnosis codes for family history of breast or ovarian cancer, genetic syndromes, lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical hyperplasia were included. Patients with a history of breast cancer were excluded. Retrospective review of prospectively acquired demographics, lifetime risk of breast cancer, and screening recommendations were obtained from the medical record. Retrospective review of the results of prospectively interpreted breast imaging examinations and image-guided biopsies were analyzed. 282 women were included. The majority of patients were premenopausal with a median age of 43. Most (69%) were referred due to a family history of breast or ovarian cancers. MRI was recommended for 84% of patients based on a documented lifetime risk >20%. Most women referred for MRI screening (88%) were compliant with this recommendation. A total of 299 breast MRI examinations were performed in 146 patients. Biopsy was performed for 32 (11%) exams and 10 cancers were detected for a positive predictive value (PPV) of 31% (based on biopsy performed) and an overall per exam cancer yield of 3.3%. Three cancers were detected in patients who did not undergo screening MRI. The 13 cancers were Stage 0-II; all patients were without evidence of disease with a median follow-up of 22 months. In a cohort of women seen by breast subspecialty providers, screening breast MRI was recommended according to guidelines, and used primarily in premenopausal women with a family history or genetic predisposition to breast cancer. Adherence to MRI screening recommendations was high and cancer yield from breast MRI was similar to that in clinical trials.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; high risk; magnetic resonance imaging; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25789917      PMCID: PMC4406773          DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  30 in total

1.  Screening breast MR imaging in women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Janice S Sung; Sharp F Malak; Punam Bajaj; Rebecca Alis; D David Dershaw; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Hormones and breast cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 15.610

3.  A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors.

Authors:  Jonathan Tyrer; Stephen W Duffy; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  BRCA1 and BRCA2: 1994 and beyond.

Authors:  Steven A Narod; William D Foulkes
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Breast cancer following radiotherapy and chemotherapy among young women with Hodgkin disease.

Authors:  Lois B Travis; Deirdre A Hill; Graça M Dores; Mary Gospodarowicz; Flora E van Leeuwen; Eric Holowaty; Bengt Glimelius; Michael Andersson; Tom Wiklund; Charles F Lynch; Mars B Van't Veer; Ingrid Glimelius; Hans Storm; Eero Pukkala; Marilyn Stovall; Rochelle Curtis; John D Boice; Ethel Gilbert
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Donald B Plewes; Kimberley A Hill; Petrina A Causer; Judit T Zubovits; Roberta A Jong; Margaret R Cutrara; Gerrit DeBoer; Martin J Yaffe; Sandra J Messner; Wendy S Meschino; Cameron A Piron; Steven A Narod
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Wendy B DeMartini; Laura Ichikawa; Constance D Lehman; Tracy Onega; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise M Henderson; Berta M Geller; Mike Hofmann; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  Rapid increase in breast magnetic resonance imaging use: trends from 2000 to 2011.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Lingling Li; Elisabeth S Malin; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Diana S M Buist; Marjorie A Rosenberg; Marina Alfisher; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Long-term results of screening with magnetic resonance imaging in women with BRCA mutations.

Authors:  K Passaperuma; E Warner; P A Causer; K A Hill; S Messner; J W Wong; R A Jong; F C Wright; M J Yaffe; E A Ramsay; S Balasingham; L Verity; A Eisen; B Curpen; R Shumak; D B Plewes; S A Narod
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Informing Women and Their Physicians about Recommendations for Adjunct Breast MRI Screening: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  John T Brinton; Lora D Barke; Mary E Freivogel; Tiffany C Talley; Michelle D Lexin; Alicia L Drew; Rachel B Beam; Deborah H Glueck
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-02-03

2.  Screening Breast MRI Outcomes in Routine Clinical Practice: Comparison to BI-RADS Benchmarks.

Authors:  Roberta M Strigel; Jennifer Rollenhagen; Elizabeth S Burnside; Mai Elezaby; Amy M Fowler; Frederick Kelcz; Lonie Salkowski; Wendy B DeMartini
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Impact of COVID-19 and Socioeconomic Factors on Delays in High-Risk MRI Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Helena Teng; Wilfred Dang; Belinda Curpen
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-08-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.