| Literature DB >> 25788962 |
Valdinei de Oliveira Araújo1, Francielly Mourão Gasparotto2, Vanessa Aranega Pires1, Aline Antunes Maciel1, Caroline Flach Ortmann3, Euclides Lara Cardozo Junior1, Emerson Luiz Botelho Lourenço1, Arquimedes Gasparotto Junior2.
Abstract
Although Vitex megapotamica (Spreng.) Moldenke is used in Brazilian folk medicine as hypolipidemic drug no study has been conducted to evaluate the effects of this species in an experimental model of atherosclerosis. So, the aim of this study was to evaluate the possible renoprotective activity of methanolic extract obtained from Vitex megapotamica (MEVM) using C57BL/6 LDLr-null mice submitted to high fat diet (HFD). MEVM was orally administered at doses of 30, 100, and 300 mg/kg, for three weeks, starting from the 2nd week of HFD. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diuretic activity were measured weekly. At the end of experiments the serum lipids, atherogenic index serum (AIS), oxidative stress, and markers of renal function were determined. HFD induced a significant increase in the systolic blood pressure, dyslipidemia, increase in AIS, and lipid peroxidation accompanied by an important reduction in renal function. Treatment with MEVM was able to prevent increase in SBP, total cholesterol, triglycerides, AIS, urea, and creatinine levels in LDLr-null mice. These effects were accompanied by a significant reduction in oxidative stress and renal injury. The data reported here support the potential of Vitex megapotamica as candidate to be an herbal medicine used in cardiovascular or renal diseases.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25788962 PMCID: PMC4350963 DOI: 10.1155/2015/475380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Representative HPLC-DAD chromatogram of Vitex megapotamica methanolic extract (MEVM). Chromatographic conditions are specified in Section 2.
Figure 2Effects of the treatment with methanolic extract of Vitex megapotamica (MEVM) on systolic blood pressure of C57BL6 LDLr-null mice. Groups of mice (n = 7) were treated for 5 weeks with commercial atherogenic diet. At the end of the second week the animals received varying doses of MEVM (30–300 mg/kg) or simvastatin (40 mg/kg) for three more weeks. Systolic blood pressure measurements were carried out on a weekly basis from the beginning of experiments for 5 weeks. Each bar represents the mean and the vertical lines show the SEM. denotes significance levels compared to the beginning of the experiments (outset). Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test ().
Effects of the administration of the methanolic extract of Vitex megapotamica (MEVM) and simvastatin (SIMV) on urinary density from LDLr-null mice.
| Group | Density (g/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outset | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | |
| N. control | 1004 ± 0.3 | 1005 ± 0.9 | 1004 ± 0.7 | 1006 ± 0.7 | 1004 ± 0.9 | 1005 ± 0.6 |
| P. control | 1005 ± 0.6 | 1006 ± 1.0 | 1007 ± 0.9 | 1007 ± 0.8 | 1008 ± 1.1 | 1011 ± 1.0b |
| MEVM (30) | 1006 ± 0.8 | 1007 ± 0.9 | 1005 ± 0.6 | 1006 ± 0.9 | 1007 ± 0.8 | 1007 ± 0.9 |
| MEVM (100) | 1005 ± 0.5 | 1004 ± 0.6 | 1005 ± 0.4 | 1006 ± 0.7 | 1005 ± 0.6 | 1006 ± 0.5a |
| MEVM (300) | 1006 ± 0.8 | 1006 ± 0.7 | 1004 ± 0.7 | 1005 ± 0.9 | 1006 ± 0.8 | 1006 ± 0.7a |
| SIMV (40) | 1005 ± 0.5 | 1004 ± 0.6 | 1005 ± 0.8 | 1005 ± 0.6 | 1006 ± 0.6 | 1005 ± 1.3a |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 7 in each group) in comparison to the positive control (a P < 0.05) or negative control (b P < 0.05) using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test.
Figure 3Treatment with methanolic extract of Vitex megapotamica (MEVM) preserves urine volume (a) and increases renal sodium excretion (b) in C57BL6 LDLr-null mice. Groups of mice (n = 7) were treated for 5 weeks with commercial atherogenic diet. At the end of the second week the animals received varying doses of MEVM (30–300 mg/kg) or simvastatin (40 mg/kg) for three more weeks. Renal function was determined out on a weekly basis from the beginning of experiments for 5 weeks. Each bar represents the mean and the vertical lines show the SEM. denotes significance levels compared to the outset of experiments. Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test ().
Figure 4HEVM-treatment prevents the reduction of renal excretion of chloride (a) and potassium (b) in C57BL6 LDLr-null mice. Groups of mice (n = 7) were treated for 5 weeks with commercial atherogenic diet. At the end of the second week the animals received varying doses of MEVM (30–300 mg/kg) or simvastatin (40 mg/kg) for three more weeks. Electrolytes excretion was determined out on a weekly basis from the beginning of experiments for 5 weeks. Each bar represents the mean and the vertical lines show the SEM. denotes significance levels compared to the outset of experiments. Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test ().
Figure 6MEVM administration prevents alterations in biomarkers of renal function ((a)–(c)) and shows significant antioxidant activity ((d)-(e)) in C57BL6 LDLr-null mice. Groups of mice (n = 7) were treated for 5 weeks with commercial atherogenic diet. At the end of the second week the animals received varying doses of MEVM (30–300 mg/kg) or simvastatin (40 mg/kg) for three more weeks. All analyses were performed at the end of the experimental period (5 weeks). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 7 in each group) in comparison to the positive control (a; P < 0.05) or negative control (b; P < 0.05) using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test.
Effects of the administration of the methanolic extract of Vitex megapotamica (MEVM) and simvastatin (SIMV) on urinary conductivity from LDLr-null mice.
| Group | Conductivity (mS/cm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outset | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | |
| N. control | 15.56 ± 0.11 | 15.36 ± 0.12 | 15.16 ± 0.22 | 14.26 ± 0.19 | 14.99 ± 0.21 | 15.01 ± 0.22 |
| P. control | 15.75 ± 0.11 | 14.99 ± 0.20 | 14.88 ± 0.18 | 15.01 ± 0.15 | 15.17 ± 0.19 | 12.29 ± 0.18b |
| MEVM (30) | 15.46 ± 0.28 | 15.36 ± 0.19 | 15.94 ± 0.20 | 16.14 ± 0.21 | 15.21 ± 0.25 | 13.33± 0.19b |
| MEVM (100) | 16.06 ± 0.23 | 16.10 ± 0.13 | 15.57 ± 0.18 | 15.27 ± 0.15 | 15.27 ± 0.15 | 15.57 ± 0.17 |
| MEVM (300) | 15.30 ± 0.22 | 15.20 ± 0.20 | 15.70 ± 0.19 | 17.96 ± 0.15a,b | 17.16 ± 0.17a,b | 17.99 ± 0.18a,b |
| SIMV (40) | 16.29 ± 0.64 | 15.96 ± 0.20 | 14.99 ± 0.18 | 14.99 ± 0.18 | 15.01 ± 0.19 | 15.81 ± 0.19 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 7 in each group) in comparison to the positive control (a P < 0.05) or negative control (b P < 0.05) using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test.
Figure 5Prolonged MEVM administration induces lipid-lowering and atheroprotective effects ((a)–(d)) in C57BL6 LDLr-null mice. Groups of mice (n = 7) were treated for 5 weeks with commercial atherogenic diet. At the end of the second week the animals received varying doses of MEVM (30–300 mg/kg) or simvastatin (40 mg/kg) for three more weeks. All analyses were performed at the end of the experimental period (5 weeks). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 7 in each group) in comparison to the positive control (a; P < 0.05) or negative control (b; P < 0.05) using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test.