| Literature DB >> 25788955 |
Masaya Saito1, Yoshihiko Yano2, Hirotaka Hirano1, Kenji Momose1, Masaru Yoshida3, Takeshi Azuma1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Finding a noninvasive method to predict liver fibrosis using inexpensive and easy-to-use markers is important.Entities:
Keywords: Biopsy; Chronic; Hepatitis C; Liver Fibrosis; des-Gamma-Carboxy Prothrombin
Year: 2015 PMID: 25788955 PMCID: PMC4350249 DOI: 10.5812/hepatmon.22978
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hepat Mon ISSN: 1735-143X Impact factor: 0.660
Diagnostic Accuracy of NX-DCP and Known Noninvasive Liver Fibrosis Markers Associated With the Presence of Significant Fibrosis [a]
| Item | Cutoff value | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | PPV, % | NPV, % | Accuracy, % | AUC | Youden | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| > 23 | 49.2 | 87.5 | 85.7 | 53.0 | 64.4 | 0.687 | 0.367 | 0.0003 |
|
| > 0.9545 | 80.3 | 35.0 | 65.3 | 53.8 | 62.4 | 0.563 | 0.153 | 0.2942 |
|
| > 0.9521 | 88.5 | 75.0 | 84.4 | 81.1 | 83.2 | 0.843 | 0.635 | < 0.0001 |
|
| > 0.0012 | 91.8 | 76.9 | 86.2 | 85.7 | 86.0 | 0.876 | 0.687 | < 0.0001 |
|
| > 3.6244 | 85.2 | 87.5 | 91.2 | 79.5 | 86.1 | 0.927 | 0.728 | < 0.0001 |
|
| > 0.914 | 88.3 | 71.4 | 84.1 | 78.1 | 82.1 | 0.831 | 0.598 | < 0.0001 |
|
| > 0 | 70.5 | 87.5 | 89.6 | 66.0 | 77.2 | 0.864 | 0.580 | < 0.0001 |
|
| > 6.6415 | 95.1 | 76.9 | 86.6 | 90.9 | 88.0 | 0.923 | 0.720 | < 0.0001 |
|
| > 4.1449 | 69.2 | 88.9 | 93.1 | 57.1 | 75.4 | 0.843 | 0.581 | < 0.0001 |
|
| > 7 | 90.2 | 80.0 | 87.3 | 84.2 | 86.1 | 0.913 | 0.702 | < 0.0001 |
|
| > 6 | 71.7 | 91.4 | 93.5 | 65.3 | 78.9 | 0.886 | 0.631 | < 0.0001 |
|
| 0 | 68.9 | 87.5 | 89.4 | 64.8 | 76.2 | 0.782 | 0.564 | < 0.0001 |
a Abbreviations: AAR, Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-Alanine Aminotransferase Ratio; APRI,
Demographic, Laboratory and Histological Features of Patients With Hepatitis C Virus-Related Liver Disease [a, b, c]
| Variable | Patients, n = 101 |
|---|---|
|
| 64.6 ± 11.8 (31-92) |
|
| 44/57 |
|
| 158.0 (141.2-175.1) |
|
| 57.4 ± 11.2 (32.2-84.0) |
|
| 22.7 ± 3.5 (15.7-32.8) |
|
| 115 (46-370) |
|
| 100.0 (48.2-100.0) |
|
| 0.99 (0.82-1.71) |
|
| 43 (14-237) |
|
| 39 (8-309) |
|
| 30 (7-467) |
|
| 4.0 (1.7-4.9) |
|
| 0.8 (0.3-3.2) |
|
| 163.6 ± 35.8(71-278) |
|
| 79/22 |
|
| 8(2-211) |
|
| 25(7-1468) |
|
| 21(14-2967) |
|
| |
| F0 | 20 |
| F1 | 4 |
| F2 | 16 |
| F3 | 4 |
| F4 | 57 |
a Abbreviations: BMI, Body Mass Index; PT, Prothrombin Time; INR, International Normalized Ratio; AST, Aspartate Aminotransferase; ALT, Alanine Aminotransferase; γ-GTP, γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase; Alb, Albumin; T-Bil, Total Bilirubin; T-cho, Total Cholesterol; AFP, Alpha Fetoprotein; DCP, Des-γ-Carboxy Prothrombin.
b The Degree of fibrosis was scored according to the New Inuyama Classification from F0 to F4.
c Data represent n, mean ± SD (range), or median (range).
Univariate Analyses of Factors Associated With the Presence of Significant Fibrosis [a]
| Factors | F0-2, n = 40 | F3-4, n = 61 | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 58.6 ± 12.4 (31-81) | 68.5 ± 9.6 (44-92) | 0.000 [ |
|
| 14/26 | 30/31 | 0.160 [ |
|
| 155.9 (141.2-175.1) | 159.4 (143.4-172.6) | 0.391 [ |
|
| 57.2 ± 12.4 (37.0-84.0) | 57.5 ± 10.8 (32.2-83.6) | 0.454 [ |
|
| 23.0 ± 3.9 (16.0-32.8) | 22.6 ± 3.3 (15.7-29.7) | 0.657 [ |
|
| 210 (88-370) | 94 (46-227) | 0.000 [ |
|
| 100.0 (67.1-100.0) | 96.5 (48.2-100.0) | 0.004 [ |
|
| 0.95 (0.82-1.21) | 1.02 (0.83-1.71) | 0.000 [ |
|
| 28 (14-237) | 56 (17-235) | 0.000 [ |
|
| 26 (10-309) | 44 (8-280) | 0.017 [ |
|
| 27 (7-285) | 34 (11-167) | 0.124 [ |
|
| 4.3 (3.3-4.9) | 3.9 (1.7-4.7) | 0.000 [ |
|
| 0.8 (0.4-2.3) | 0.9 (0.3-3.2) | 0.100 [ |
|
| 181.8 ± 35.1 (122-278) | 152.0 ± 31.2 (71-228) | 0.000 [ |
|
| 31/9 | 48/13 | 0.887 [ |
|
| 5 (2-55) | 11 (2-211) | 0.000 [ |
|
| 24 (13-43) | 28 (7-1468) | 0.155 [ |
|
| 21 (15-32) | 22 (14-2967) | 0.002 [ |
a Abbreviations: BMI, Body Mass Index; PT, Prothrombin Time, INR: International Normalized Ratio; AST, Aspartate Aminotransferase; ALT, Alanine Aminotransferase; γ-GTP, γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase; Alb, Albumin; T-Bil, Total Bilirubin; T-cho, Total Cholesterol; AFP, Alpha Fetoprotein; DCP, Des-γ-Carboxy Prothrombin.
bTwo sample t-test.
d Chi squared test.
cWilcoxon rank sum test.
Multivariate Analyses of Significant Univariate Factors Associated With the Presence of Significant Fibrosis [a]
| Variable | B | SE | P value | Exp (B) | 95% CI of Exp (B) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lower limit | upper limit | |||||
|
| 3.250 | 0.068 | 0.001 | 1.201 | 1.075 | 1.341 |
|
| -3.770 | 0.083 | 0.000 | 0.588 | 0.447 | 0.775 |
|
| 2.220 | 0.189 | 0.026 | 1.362 | 1.037 | 1.787 |
a Abbreviation: B, Regression coefficient; CI, Confidential interval; Exp (B), odds ratio; SE: standard error.
Figure 1.The Relationship Between NX-DCP and Stage of Fibrosis in HCV-related Liver Disease
The numbers of HCV-related patients with F0, F1, F2, F3, and F4 were 20, 4, 16, 4, and 57, respectively. Using the Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test, the increase of NX-DCP was significantly related to the increase of fibrosis stage (P = 0.006).
Figure 2.NX-DCP in Patients With or Without Significant Fibrosis
NX-DCP was significantly higher in patients with significant fibrosis (F3-4) than in those without it (F0-2) (P = 0.002).
Figure 3.The ROC Curves of NX-DCP and the Known Noninvasive Liver Fibrosis Markers in the Presence of Significant Fibrosis
NX-DCP, APRI, modified-APRI, Fib-4, GUCI, Lok index, Forns index, Hui score, API, CDS, and Pohl score also discriminated well between patients with and without significant fibrosis. On the other hand, AAR did not discriminate well between the two groups (Figure 4).
Figure 4.Calibration Plot of NX-DCP in Patients With or Without Significant Fibrosis
By calibration plot of NX-DCP in patients with or without significant fibrosis, there was no discrepancy between the predicted value and the observed average. The 95% CI (the portion surrounded by two broken lines) also did not deviate from a diagonal line, which indicates complete conformity.