Literature DB >> 25788737

Global gene expression profiling of two switchgrass cultivars following inoculation with Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN.

Alejandra Lara-Chavez1, Scott Lowman2, Seonhwa Kim1, Yuhong Tang3, Jiyi Zhang3, Michael Udvardi3, Jerzy Nowak4, Barry Flinn5, Chuansheng Mei6.   

Abstract

Improvement and year-to-year stabilization of biomass yields are primary objectives for the development of a low-input switchgrass feedstock production system using microbial endophytes. An earlier investigation of the effect of Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN on switchgrass germplasm demonstrated differential responses between genotypes. PsJN inoculation of cv. Alamo (lowland ecotype) increased the plant root system, shoot length, and biomass yields, whereas it had no beneficial effect on cv. Cave-in-Rock (upland ecotype). To understand the gene networks governing plant growth promotion responses triggered by PsJN, the gene expression profiles were analysed in these two hosts, following seedling inoculation. The Affymetrix platform switchgrass expressed sequence tag (EST) microarray chip representing 122 972 probe sets, developed by the DOE BioEnergy Science Center, was employed to assess transcript abundance at 0.5, 2, 4, and 8 DAI (days after PsJN inoculation). Approximately 20 000 switchgrass probe sets showed significant responses in either cultivar. Switchgrass identifiers were used to map 19 421 genes in MapMan software. There were apparent differences in gene expression profiling between responsive and non-responsive cultivars after PsJN inoculation. Overall, there were 14 984 and 9691 genes affected by PsJN inoculation in Alamo and Cave-in-Rock, respectively. Of these, 394 are annotated as pathogenesis-related genes. In the responsive cv. Alamo, 68 pathogenesis-related genes were affected, compared with only 10 in the non-responsive cv. Cave-in-Rock. At the very early stage at 0.5 DAI, both cultivars exhibited similar recognition and defence responses, such as genes in signalling and proteolysis, after which the defence reaction in the responsive cv. Alamo became weaker while it was sustained in non-responsive cv. Cave-in-Rock.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beneficial bacterial endophyte; Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN; Panicum virgatum L.; gene expression profiling; genotypic specificity; growth promotion

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25788737     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  4 in total

1.  A New Approach to Modify Plant Microbiomes and Traits by Introducing Beneficial Bacteria at Flowering into Progeny Seeds.

Authors:  Birgit Mitter; Nikolaus Pfaffenbichler; Richard Flavell; Stéphane Compant; Livio Antonielli; Alexandra Petric; Teresa Berninger; Muhammad Naveed; Raheleh Sheibani-Tezerji; Geoffrey von Maltzahn; Angela Sessitsch
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 2.  Phytohormone Mediation of Interactions Between Plants and Non-Symbiotic Growth Promoting Bacteria Under Edaphic Stresses.

Authors:  Guzel Kudoyarova; Tatiana Arkhipova; Tatiana Korshunova; Margarita Bakaeva; Oleg Loginov; Ian C Dodd
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Time-Course Microarray Analysis Reveals Differences between Transcriptional Changes in Tomato Leaves Triggered by Mild and Severe Variants of Potato Spindle Tuber Viroid.

Authors:  Aneta Więsyk; Roksana Iwanicka-Nowicka; Anna Fogtman; Włodzimierz Zagórski-Ostoja; Anna Góra-Sochacka
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 4.  Analysis of Gene Expression Changes in Plants Grown in Salty Soil in Response to Inoculation with Halophilic Bacteria.

Authors:  Ashley K Miller; Brent L Nielsen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.