Literature DB >> 25786855

The SMC' is a highly accurate approximation to the ancestral recombination graph.

Peter R Wilton1, Shai Carmi2, Asger Hobolth3.   

Abstract

Two sequentially Markov coalescent models (SMC and SMC') are available as tractable approximations to the ancestral recombination graph (ARG). We present a Markov process describing coalescence at two fixed points along a pair of sequences evolving under the SMC'. Using our Markov process, we derive a number of new quantities related to the pairwise SMC', thereby analytically quantifying for the first time the similarity between the SMC' and the ARG. We use our process to show that the joint distribution of pairwise coalescence times at recombination sites under the SMC' is the same as it is marginally under the ARG, which demonstrates that the SMC' is, in a particular well-defined, intuitive sense, the most appropriate first-order sequentially Markov approximation to the ARG. Finally, we use these results to show that population size estimates under the pairwise SMC are asymptotically biased, while under the pairwise SMC' they are approximately asymptotically unbiased.
Copyright © 2015 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Markov approximation; ancestral recombination graph; consistency; ergodicity; sequentially Markov coalescent

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25786855      PMCID: PMC4423375          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.173898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  26 in total

1.  The two-locus ancestral graph in a subdivided population: convergence as the number of demes grows in the island model.

Authors:  Sabin Lessard; John Wakeley
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Linkage disequilibrium under recurrent bottlenecks.

Authors:  E Schaper; A Eriksson; M Rafajlovic; S Sagitov; B Mehlig
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A Markov Chain Model of Coalescence with Recombination

Authors: 
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Bayesian inference of local trees along chromosomes by the sequential Markov coalescent.

Authors:  Chaozhi Zheng; Mary K Kuhner; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Estimating variable effective population sizes from multiple genomes: a sequentially markov conditional sampling distribution approach.

Authors:  Sara Sheehan; Kelley Harris; Yun S Song
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genome-wide inference of ancestral recombination graphs.

Authors:  Matthew D Rasmussen; Melissa J Hubisz; Ilan Gronau; Adam Siepel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Estimating divergence time and ancestral effective population size of Bornean and Sumatran orangutan subspecies using a coalescent hidden Markov model.

Authors:  Thomas Mailund; Julien Y Dutheil; Asger Hobolth; Gerton Lunter; Mikkel H Schierup
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Fast "coalescent" simulation.

Authors:  Paul Marjoram; Jeff D Wall
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Calibrating the Human Mutation Rate via Ancestral Recombination Density in Diploid Genomes.

Authors:  Mark Lipson; Po-Ru Loh; Sriram Sankararaman; Nick Patterson; Bonnie Berger; David Reich
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Inference of population history using coalescent HMMs: review and outlook.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Spence; Matthias Steinrücken; Jonathan Terhorst; Yun S Song
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  Robust and scalable inference of population history from hundreds of unphased whole genomes.

Authors:  Jonathan Terhorst; John A Kamm; Yun S Song
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  The distribution of waiting distances in ancestral recombination graphs.

Authors:  Yun Deng; Yun S Song; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 1.514

4.  Efficient ancestry and mutation simulation with msprime 1.0.

Authors:  Franz Baumdicker; Gertjan Bisschop; Daniel Goldstein; Graham Gower; Aaron P Ragsdale; Georgia Tsambos; Sha Zhu; Bjarki Eldon; E Castedo Ellerman; Jared G Galloway; Ariella L Gladstein; Gregor Gorjanc; Bing Guo; Ben Jeffery; Warren W Kretzschumar; Konrad Lohse; Michael Matschiner; Dominic Nelson; Nathaniel S Pope; Consuelo D Quinto-Cortés; Murillo F Rodrigues; Kumar Saunack; Thibaut Sellinger; Kevin Thornton; Hugo van Kemenade; Anthony W Wohns; Yan Wong; Simon Gravel; Andrew D Kern; Jere Koskela; Peter L Ralph; Jerome Kelleher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Contemporary Demographic Reconstruction Methods Are Robust to Genome Assembly Quality: A Case Study in Tasmanian Devils.

Authors:  Austin H Patton; Mark J Margres; Amanda R Stahlke; Sarah Hendricks; Kevin Lewallen; Rodrigo K Hamede; Manuel Ruiz-Aravena; Oliver Ryder; Hamish I McCallum; Menna E Jones; Paul A Hohenlohe; Andrew Storfer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Recombination-aware phylogeographic inference using the structured coalescent with ancestral recombination.

Authors:  Fangfang Guo; Ignazio Carbone; David A Rasmussen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.779

7.  Bayesian Nonparametric Inference of Population Size Changes from Sequential Genealogies.

Authors:  Julia A Palacios; John Wakeley; Sohini Ramachandran
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Efficient pedigree recording for fast population genetics simulation.

Authors:  Jerome Kelleher; Kevin R Thornton; Jaime Ashander; Peter L Ralph
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.475

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.