| Literature DB >> 25786359 |
Jitao Li1, Mingming Jiang2, Chunxiang Xu3, Yueyue Wang3, Yi Lin3, Junfeng Lu3, Zengliang Shi3.
Abstract
The response of graphene surface plasmon (SP) in the ultraviolet (UV) region and the realization of short-wavelength semiconductor lasers not only are two hot research areas of great academic and practical significance, but also are two important issues lacked of good understanding. In this work, a hybrid Fabry-Perot (F-P) microcavity, comprising of monolayer graphene covered ZnO microbelt, was constructed to investigate the fundamental physics of graphene SP and the functional extension of ZnO UV lasing. Through the coupling between graphene SP modes and conventional optical microcavity modes of ZnO, improved F-P lasing performance was realized, including the lowered lasing threshold, the improved lasing quality and the remarkably enhanced lasing intensity. The underlying mechanism of the improved lasing performance was proposed based on theoretical simulation and experimental characterization. The results are helpful to design new types of optic and photoelectronic devices based on SP coupling in graphene/semiconductor hybrid structures.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25786359 PMCID: PMC4365383 DOI: 10.1038/srep09263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) SEM image of an individual ZnO microbelt. (b) The schematic diagram for the optical measurement setup.
Figure 2(a) The standing-wave pattern of the optical field in the x-y plane (the cross-section plane) of the bare microbelt. The yellow line denotes the interface of ZnO/air, i.e. the cavity mirror of the microcavity, and the length direction of the microbelt goes along the z axis. (b) The resonance spectrum of the stored energy for the bare microcavity with air/ZnO interface. (c) Graphene SP excited along the interface of graphene/ZnO. The region between graphene and the red dash line denotes the crossover region of graphene SP evanescent wave field and the optical microcavity modes. (d) The resonance spectrum of the stored energy for the hybrid microcavity.
Figure 3(a, b) Optical images of the ZnO microbelt partially covered with monolayer graphene: (a) before and (b) after dissolving of PMMA. The red dash line denotes the boundary of the areas with and without graphene. (c) Raman spectrum from spot 2 of the graphene/ZnO microbelt hybrid microcavity. (d) PL spectra from the two spots on the microbelt with (spot 2) and without (spot 1) graphene under the same excitation condition.
Figure 4Dark field optical images of an individual ZnO microbelt (a) before and (b) after being covered with graphene under the same excitation of 325 nm UV laser.
Figure 5Excitation power density dependent PL spectra from (a) spot 1 and (b) spot 2. (c) Correlation between emission intensity and excitation power density for the bare and the graphene/ZnO microbelt hybrid microcavity. (d) Comparison of the lasing spectra from the two spots under the same excitation power density of 140 KW/cm2.