Literature DB >> 25785960

Analysis of the Fracture Mechanism of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Rods That Failed Clinically After Spinal Instrumentation Surgery.

Kenta Yamanaka1, Manami Mori, Ken Yamazaki, Ruriko Kumagai, Minoru Doita, Akihiko Chiba.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrieval analysis of 2 Ti-6Al-4V alloy rods that fractured after spinal instrumentation surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the mechanism that underlies fractures of Ti-6Al-4V alloy rods after spinal instrumentation surgery from a materials science viewpoint. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Rod failures after spinal instrumentation surgery are often reported and many case-based studies have been published. However, the details of the mechanism that underlies the fractures have not yet been fully elucidated.
METHODS: Two patients, a 71-year-old female and an 11-year-old male, underwent radiography and removal of their fractured rods. The latter patient had been treated using the growing-rod method. Metallurgical failure analysis of the retrieved rods was conducted, and material properties were compared between the unused and fractured rods.
RESULTS: The microstructures and mechanical properties of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy rods that failed after spinal instrumentation surgery were similar to those of unused rods. Analysis of the fracture surfaces clearly identified fatigue cracking in both cases that would have lowered the resistance of the rods to failures caused by external stresses. Shot blasting the surfaces of Ti-6Al-4V alloy rods and bending the rods to fit particular contours, which is always conducted during spinal instrumentation surgery, probably introduced fatigue cracking because the alloy is highly notch sensitive.
CONCLUSION: Improvements should be made to rod design and/or rod material, because the fatigue resistance of titanium alloys is intrinsically lower than that of other commercially available rod materials, including cobalt-chromium alloys. These imperfections may have greater consequences for the growing-rod method and pseudarthrosis, where the rods are not completely fixed, and they subsequently suffer from severe long-arm moments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25785960     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Rigid reconstruction with periacetabular multiple screws after the resection of malignant pelvic tumours involving the sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  Bungo Otsuki; Takeshi Okamoto; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Akio Sakamoto; Junya Toguchida; Koichi Murata; Takayoshi Shimizu; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Analysing a mechanism of failure in retrieved magnetically controlled spinal rods.

Authors:  Vasiliki C Panagiotopoulou; Stewart K Tucker; Robert K Whittaker; Harry S Hothi; Johann Henckel; Julian J H Leong; Thomas Ember; John A Skinner; Alister J Hart
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Current benchtop protocols are not appropriate for the evaluation of distraction-based growing rods: a literature review to justify a new protocol and its development.

Authors:  Niloufar Shekouhi; Amey Kelkar; David Dick; Vijay K Goel; Derek Shaw
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The validation study of preoperative surgical planning for corrective target in adult spinal deformity surgery with 5-year follow-up for mechanical complications.

Authors:  Shin Oe; Yu Yamato; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Go Yoshida; Tomohiro Banno; Hideyuki Arima; Koichiro Ide; Tomohiro Yamada; Kenta Kurosu; Keiichi Nakai; Takeuchi Yuki; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-10-16       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 5.  Metallic Implants Used in Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Jakub Litak; Michał Szymoniuk; Wojciech Czyżewski; Zofia Hoffman; Joanna Litak; Leon Sakwa; Piotr Kamieniak
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.748

6.  C7 intra-laminar screws for complex cervicothoracic spine surgery-a case series.

Authors:  Peter John Wilson; Michael Derrick Selby
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

7.  Effects of the secondary shot in the double shot peening process on the residual compressive stress distribution of Ti-6Al-4V.

Authors:  Goratouch Ongtrakulkij; Anak Khantachawana; Julathep Kajornchaiyakul; Katsuyoshi Kondoh
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-01-12

8.  Stacking-fault strengthening of biomedical Co-Cr-Mo alloy via multipass thermomechanical processing.

Authors:  Kenta Yamanaka; Manami Mori; Shigeo Sato; Akihiko Chiba
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Biomechanical comparison between titanium and cobalt chromium rods used in a pedicle subtraction osteotomy model.

Authors:  Kalpit N Shah; Gregory Walker; Sarath C Koruprolu; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2018-03-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.