Literature DB >> 25785757

Modeling alterations in sinonasal physiology after skull base surgery.

Dennis O Frank-Ito1, Mirabelle Sajisevi, C Arturo Solares, David W Jang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endonasal endoscopic skull base surgery (EESBS) often requires significant alterations in intranasal anatomy. For example, posterior septectomy (PS) with middle turbinate resection (MTR) is frequently performed to provide access to large sellar and clival tumors. However, little is known about the alterations that occur in sinonasal physiology. This study was designed to assess changes in sinonasal physiology after virtually performed endoscopic skull base surgery.
METHODS: Three-dimensional models of the sinonasal passage were created from computed tomography scans in three subjects with varying anatomy: no SD (SD), right anterior SD, and left anterior SD, respectively. Four additional surgery types were performed virtually on each model: endoscopic transsphenoidal approach (ETSA) with small (1 cm) PS (smPS), ETSA with complete (2 cm) PS, ETSA with smPS and right MTR, and ETSA with complete PS and right MTR. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed on the 3 presurgery and 12 virtual surgery models to assess changes from surgery types.
RESULTS: Increased nasal airflow corresponded to amount of tissue removed. Effects of MTR on unilateral airflow allocation were unchanged in subject with no SD, worsened in leftward SD, and reversed in rightward SD. Severity of airflow and mucosal wall interactions trended with amount of tissue removed. MTR hindered flow interactions with the olfactory mucosa in subjects with SD.
CONCLUSION: CFD simulations on virtual surgery models are able to reasonably detect changes in airflow patterns in the computer-generated nasal models. In addition, each patient's unique anatomy influences the magnitude and direction of these changes after virtual EESBS. Once future studies can reliably correlate CFD parameters with patient symptoms, CFD will be a useful clinical tool in surgical planning and maximizing patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25785757     DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy        ISSN: 1945-8932            Impact factor:   2.467


  10 in total

1.  Editorial: new perspectives in the pathogenesis and management of rhinologic and allergic airway disease.

Authors:  Jivianne T Lee
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.467

2.  Computational fluid dynamics after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery-possible empty nose syndrome in the context of middle turbinate resection.

Authors:  Guillermo Maza; Chengyu Li; Jillian P Krebs; Bradley A Otto; Alexander A Farag; Ricardo L Carrau; Kai Zhao
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.858

3.  Investigating the effects of laryngotracheal stenosis on upper airway aerodynamics.

Authors:  Tracy Cheng; David Carpenter; Seth Cohen; David Witsell; Dennis O Frank-Ito
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Is nasal airflow disrupted after endoscopic skull base surgery? A short review.

Authors:  M Májovský; F Trnka; H Schmirlerová; J Betka; T Hyhlík; David Netuka
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  A hierarchical stepwise approach to evaluate nasal patency after virtual surgery for nasal airway obstruction.

Authors:  Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; Azadeh A T Borojeni; Guilherme J M Garcia; John S Rhee
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Analysis of nasal air conditioning in subjects with unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity.

Authors:  Hang Li; Hannah L Martin; Jeffrey R Marcus; Dennis O Frank-Ito
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.821

7.  Computational Analysis of the Mature Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity on Nasal Patency.

Authors:  Dennis O Frank-Ito; David J Carpenter; Tracy Cheng; Yash J Avashia; David A Brown; Adam Glener; Alexander Allori; Jeffrey R Marcus
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-05-16

Review 8.  Computational technology for nasal cartilage-related clinical research and application.

Authors:  Bing Shi; Hanyao Huang
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 6.344

9.  Orally Inhaled Drug Particle Transport in Computerized Models of Laryngotracheal Stenosis.

Authors:  Dennis Onyeka Frank-Ito; Seth Morris Cohen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Superior turbinate management and olfactory outcome after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

Authors:  Pu Li; Kai Luo; Qiuhang Zhang; Zhenlin Wang
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.858

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.