Literature DB >> 25785493

Simultaneous inference of cancer pathways and tumor progression from cross-sectional mutation data.

Benjamin J Raphael1, Fabio Vandin1,2.   

Abstract

Recent cancer sequencing studies provide a wealth of somatic mutation data from a large number of patients. One of the most intriguing and challenging questions arising from this data is to determine whether the temporal order of somatic mutations in a cancer follows any common progression. Since we usually obtain only one sample from a patient, such inferences are commonly made from cross-sectional data from different patients. This analysis is complicated by the extensive variation in the somatic mutations across different patients, variation that is reduced by examining combinations of mutations in various pathways. Thus far, methods to reconstruct tumor progression at the pathway level have restricted attention to known, a priori defined pathways. In this work we show how to simultaneously infer pathways and the temporal order of their mutations from cross-sectional data, leveraging on the exclusivity property of driver mutations within a pathway. We define the pathway linear progression model, and derive a combinatorial formulation for the problem of finding the optimal model from mutation data. We show that with enough samples the optimal solution to this problem uniquely identifies the correct model with high probability even when errors are present in the mutation data. We then formulate the problem as an integer linear program (ILP), which allows the analysis of datasets from recent studies with large numbers of samples. We use our algorithm to analyze somatic mutation data from three cancer studies, including two studies from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) on large number of samples on colorectal cancer and glioblastoma. The models reconstructed with our method capture most of the current knowledge of the progression of somatic mutations in these cancer types, while also providing new insights on the tumor progression at the pathway level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25785493      PMCID: PMC4449706          DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2014.0161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  31 in total

1.  KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M Kanehisa; S Goto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Mtreemix: a software package for learning and using mixture models of mutagenetic trees.

Authors:  Niko Beerenwinkel; Jörg Rahnenführer; Rolf Kaiser; Daniel Hoffmann; Joachim Selbig; Thomas Lengauer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Learning multiple evolutionary pathways from cross-sectional data.

Authors:  Niko Beerenwinkel; Jörg Rahnenführer; Martin Däumer; Daniel Hoffmann; Rolf Kaiser; Joachim Selbig; Thomas Lengauer
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Cameron W Brennan; Roel G W Verhaak; Aaron McKenna; Benito Campos; Houtan Noushmehr; Sofie R Salama; Siyuan Zheng; Debyani Chakravarty; J Zachary Sanborn; Samuel H Berman; Rameen Beroukhim; Brady Bernard; Chang-Jiun Wu; Giannicola Genovese; Ilya Shmulevich; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Lihua Zou; Rahulsimham Vegesna; Sachet A Shukla; Giovanni Ciriello; W K Yung; Wei Zhang; Carrie Sougnez; Tom Mikkelsen; Kenneth Aldape; Darell D Bigner; Erwin G Van Meir; Michael Prados; Andrew Sloan; Keith L Black; Jennifer Eschbacher; Gaetano Finocchiaro; William Friedman; David W Andrews; Abhijit Guha; Mary Iacocca; Brian P O'Neill; Greg Foltz; Jerome Myers; Daniel J Weisenberger; Robert Penny; Raju Kucherlapati; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes; Richard Gibbs; Marco Marra; Gordon B Mills; Eric Lander; Paul Spellman; Richard Wilson; Chris Sander; John Weinstein; Matthew Meyerson; Stacey Gabriel; Peter W Laird; David Haussler; Gad Getz; Lynda Chin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Discovering functional modules by identifying recurrent and mutually exclusive mutational patterns in tumors.

Authors:  Christopher A Miller; Stephen H Settle; Erik P Sulman; Kenneth D Aldape; Aleksandar Milosavljevic
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.063

6.  A mathematical framework to determine the temporal sequence of somatic genetic events in cancer.

Authors:  Camille Stephan-Otto Attolini; Yu-Kang Cheng; Rameen Beroukhim; Gad Getz; Omar Abdel-Wahab; Ross L Levine; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Franziska Michor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  New probabilistic network models and algorithms for oncogenesis.

Authors:  Marcus Hjelm; Mattias Höglund; Jens Lagergren
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.479

8.  Distance-based reconstruction of tree models for oncogenesis.

Authors:  R Desper; F Jiang; O P Kallioniemi; H Moch; C H Papadimitriou; A A Schäffer
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.479

9.  The temporal order of genetic and pathway alterations in tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Moritz Gerstung; Nicholas Eriksson; Jimmy Lin; Bert Vogelstein; Niko Beerenwinkel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Simultaneous identification of multiple driver pathways in cancer.

Authors:  Mark D M Leiserson; Dima Blokh; Roded Sharan; Benjamin J Raphael
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  11 in total

1.  Efficient algorithms to discover alterations with complementary functional association in cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca Sarto Basso; Dorit S Hochbaum; Fabio Vandin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 2.  The value of genomics in dissecting the RAS-network and in guiding therapeutics for RAS-driven cancers.

Authors:  Gajendra Shrestha; Shelley M MacNeil; Jasmine A McQuerry; David F Jenkins; Sunil Sharma; Andrea H Bild
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 3.  Computational approaches for the identification of cancer genes and pathways.

Authors:  Christos M Dimitrakopoulos; Niko Beerenwinkel
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2016-11-11

Review 4.  Computational Methods for Characterizing Cancer Mutational Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Fabio Vandin
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Cancer progression models and fitness landscapes: a many-to-many relationship.

Authors:  Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Modelling cancer progression using Mutual Hazard Networks.

Authors:  Rudolf Schill; Stefan Solbrig; Tilo Wettig; Rainer Spang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Integrating mutation and gene expression cross-sectional data to infer cancer progression.

Authors:  Julia L Fleck; Ana B Pavel; Christos G Cassandras
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2016-01-25

Review 8.  Computational Cancer Biology: An Evolutionary Perspective.

Authors:  Niko Beerenwinkel; Chris D Greenman; Jens Lagergren
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Every which way? On predicting tumor evolution using cancer progression models.

Authors:  Ramon Diaz-Uriarte; Claudia Vasallo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  A probabilistic method for leveraging functional annotations to enhance estimation of the temporal order of pathway mutations during carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Menghan Wang; Tianxin Yu; Jinpeng Liu; Li Chen; Arnold J Stromberg; John L Villano; Susanne M Arnold; Chunming Liu; Chi Wang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.