Xing-Wen Liu1, Ping Zhao2, Li-Qun Gao1, Jing Hu1, Li-Ying Wang1. 1. Department of Liver Transplantation and Laparoscopic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University Urumqi 830011, China. 2. Department of Hepatobiliary and Hydatid, First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University Urumqi 830011, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of exploration of common bile duct through cystic duct or T type tube in CE patients. METHODS: One hundred and fifty six patients with chronic CE received decompression of biliary tract from January 2007 to December 2012 were included. Exploration of common bile duct was performed through cystic duct (n=102) or T type tube (n=54). Psychological reactions were monitored including inconvenient position alteration due to carrying of the drainage tube, anxiety of the folding and prolapse of drainage tube, folding of the drainage tube, and any pain during the body position change. RESULTS: No significant difference was noticed in the body position alteration discomfort in both groups (P>0.05). Statistical difference was noted in the anxiety of folding and prolapse of draining tube (P<0.05), and improvement of the clinical symptoms (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A higher possibility of wound, enlarged tube-carrying duration, and lower sense of discomfort, were noticed in patients underwent exploration of common bile duct through T type tube. Higher sense of comfort was reported in patients received exploration of common bile duct through cystic duct tube.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of exploration of common bile duct through cystic duct or T type tube in CE patients. METHODS: One hundred and fifty six patients with chronic CE received decompression of biliary tract from January 2007 to December 2012 were included. Exploration of common bile duct was performed through cystic duct (n=102) or T type tube (n=54). Psychological reactions were monitored including inconvenient position alteration due to carrying of the drainage tube, anxiety of the folding and prolapse of drainage tube, folding of the drainage tube, and any pain during the body position change. RESULTS: No significant difference was noticed in the body position alteration discomfort in both groups (P>0.05). Statistical difference was noted in the anxiety of folding and prolapse of draining tube (P<0.05), and improvement of the clinical symptoms (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A higher possibility of wound, enlarged tube-carrying duration, and lower sense of discomfort, were noticed in patients underwent exploration of common bile duct through T type tube. Higher sense of comfort was reported in patients received exploration of common bile duct through cystic duct tube.