Literature DB >> 25784386

Detangling complex relationships in forensic data: principles and use of causal networks and their application to clinical forensic science.

Thomas Lefèvre1, Aude Lepresle, Patrick Chariot.   

Abstract

The search for complex, nonlinear relationships and causality in data is hindered by the availability of techniques in many domains, including forensic science. Linear multivariable techniques are useful but present some shortcomings. In the past decade, Bayesian approaches have been introduced in forensic science. To date, authors have mainly focused on providing an alternative to classical techniques for quantifying effects and dealing with uncertainty. Causal networks, including Bayesian networks, can help detangle complex relationships in data. A Bayesian network estimates the joint probability distribution of data and graphically displays dependencies between variables and the circulation of information between these variables. In this study, we illustrate the interest in utilizing Bayesian networks for dealing with complex data through an application in clinical forensic science. Evaluating the functional impairment of assault survivors is a complex task for which few determinants are known. As routinely estimated in France, the duration of this impairment can be quantified by days of 'Total Incapacity to Work' ('Incapacité totale de travail,' ITT). In this study, we used a Bayesian network approach to identify the injury type, victim category and time to evaluation as the main determinants of the 'Total Incapacity to Work' (TIW). We computed the conditional probabilities associated with the TIW node and its parents. We compared this approach with a multivariable analysis, and the results of both techniques were converging. Thus, Bayesian networks should be considered a reliable means to detangle complex relationships in data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25784386     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-015-1164-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of scientific evidence using Bayesian networks.

Authors:  Paolo Garbolino; Franco Taroni
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2002-02-18       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Dynamic Bayesian network and nonparametric regression for nonlinear modeling of gene networks from time series gene expression data.

Authors:  Sunyong Kim; Seiya Imoto; Satoru Miyano
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Victims of assault: a Europe-wide review of procedures for evaluating the seriousness of injuries.

Authors:  M Gignon; S Paupière; O Jardè; C Manaouil
Journal:  Med Sci Law       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.266

4.  Non-adult dental age assessment: correspondence analysis and linear regression versus Bayesian predictions.

Authors:  J Braga; Y Heuze; O Chabadel; N K Sonan; A Gueramy
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 5.  Bayesian network analysis of signaling networks: a primer.

Authors:  Dana Pe'er
Journal:  Sci STKE       Date:  2005-04-26

6.  Decision-theoretic analysis of forensic sampling criteria using bayesian decision networks.

Authors:  A Biedermann; S Bozza; P Garbolino; F Taroni
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Human dental age estimation using third molar developmental stages: does a Bayesian approach outperform regression models to discriminate between juveniles and adults?

Authors:  P W Thevissen; S Fieuws; G Willems
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 8.  Age estimation of unaccompanied minors. Part I. General considerations.

Authors:  A Schmeling; W Reisinger; G Geserick; A Olze
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Combining directed acyclic graphs and the change-in-estimate procedure as a novel approach to adjustment-variable selection in epidemiology.

Authors:  David Evans; Basile Chaix; Thierry Lobbedez; Christian Verger; Antoine Flahault
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Granger causality vs. dynamic Bayesian network inference: a comparative study.

Authors:  Cunlu Zou; Katherine J Denby; Jianfeng Feng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  A proof-of-concept study to construct Bayesian network decision models for supporting the categorization of sudden unexpected infant death.

Authors:  Hideki Hamayasu; Masashi Miyao; Chihiro Kawai; Toshio Osamura; Akira Yamamoto; Hirozo Minami; Hitoshi Abiru; Keiji Tamaki; Hirokazu Kotani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Violence at work: forensic medical examination of police officers assaulted while on duty: comparisons with other groups of workers in two centres of the Paris area, 2010-2012.

Authors:  Catherine Dang; Céline Denis; Sophie Gahide; Patrick Chariot; Thomas Lefèvre
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Data by data, Big Data.

Authors:  Branimir K Hackenberger
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 1.351

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.