Literature DB >> 25784369

PROMIS for Laparoscopy.

Juliane Bingener1, Jeff A Sloan, Drew K Seisler, Andrea L McConico, Pamela E Skaran, David R Farley, Mark J Truty.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We tested the responsiveness of the National Institutes of Health-sponsored Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Information System (PROMIS) global health short form and a linear analog self-assessment for laparoscopy.
METHODS: From May 2011 through December 2013, patients undergoing laparoscopy responded to patient reported outcome questionnaires perioperatively. Composite and single item scores were compared.
RESULTS: One hundred fifteen patients, mean age 55 years, 58 % female, were enrolled. Visual analog pain scores differed significantly from baseline (mean 1.7 ± 2.3) to postoperative day 1 (mean 4.8 ± 2.6) and 7 (mean 2.5 ± 2.1) (p<0.0001). PROMIS physical subscale and total physical component subscore differed significantly from baseline (14.4 ± 3.0/47.4 ± 8.3) to postoperative day 1 (12.7 ± 3.2/42.1 ± 8.8) (p=0.0007/0.0003), due to everyday physical activities (p=0.0001). Linear analog self-assessment scores differed from baseline for pain frequency (p<0.0001), pain severity (p<0.0001), and social activity (p=0.0052); 40 % of subjects reported worsening in PROMIS physical T-score to postoperative day 1 and 25 % to postoperative day 7. Linear analog self-assessment mental well-being scores were worse in 32 % of patients at postoperative day 7, emotional well-being in 28 %, social activity in 24 %, and fatigue in 20 % of patients.
CONCLUSION: Single items and change from baseline are responsive perioperative quality of life assessments for laparoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25784369      PMCID: PMC4405496          DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2789-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  27 in total

Review 1.  Costs and quality of life after endoscopic repair of inguinal hernia vs open tension-free repair: a review.

Authors:  M Gholghesaei; H R Langeveld; R Veldkamp; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Maria A Cassera; Georg O Spaun; Chet W Hammill; Paul D Hansen; Shaghayegh Aliabadi-Wahle
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Quality of life and/or symptom control in randomized clinical trials for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  F Joly; J Vardy; M Pintilie; I F Tannock
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Marco Maria Lirici; Andrea Domenico Califano; Pierluigi Angelini; Francesco Corcione
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Comparison of provider-assessed and patient-reported outcome measures of acute skin toxicity during a Phase III trial of mometasone cream versus placebo during breast radiotherapy: the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (N06C4).

Authors:  Michelle A Neben-Wittich; Pamela J Atherton; David J Schwartz; Jeff A Sloan; Patricia C Griffin; Richard L Deming; Jon C Anders; Charles L Loprinzi; Kelli N Burger; James A Martenson; Robert C Miller
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Impact of polypropylene amount on functional outcome and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair by the TAPP procedure using pure, mixed, and titanium-coated meshes.

Authors:  Ruediger Horstmann; Matthias Hellwig; Claus Classen; Susanne Röttgermann; Daniel Palmes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The association of quality-of-life measures with malignancy and survival in patients with pancreatic pathology.

Authors:  Vic Velanovich
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer 1 year after diagnosis compared with the general population: a population-based study.

Authors:  Volker Arndt; Henrike Merx; Christa Stegmaier; Hartwig Ziegler; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Double-Blinded Randomized Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Procedures Using Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Juliane Bingener; Pam Skaran; Andrea McConico; Paul Novotny; Peter Wettstein; David M Sletten; Myung Park; Philip Low; Jeff Sloan
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Patient-reported outcome measures to evaluate postoperative quality of life in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Margot E Lodge; Chris Moran; Adam D J Sutton; Hui-Ching Lee; Jugdeep K Dhesi; Nadine E Andrew; Darshini R Ayton; David J Hunter-Smith; Velandai K Srikanth; David A Snowdon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  American Society for Enhanced Recovery (ASER) and Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) Joint Consensus Statement on Optimal Analgesia within an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Colorectal Surgery: Part 2-From PACU to the Transition Home.

Authors:  Michael J Scott; Matthew D McEvoy; Debra B Gordon; Stuart A Grant; Julie K M Thacker; Christopher L Wu; Tong J Gan; Monty G Mythen; Andrew D Shaw; Timothy E Miller
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-13

4.  Mobile Phone-Based Measures of Activity, Step Count, and Gait Speed: Results From a Study of Older Ambulatory Adults in a Naturalistic Setting.

Authors:  Cassia Rye Hanton; Yong-Jun Kwon; Thawda Aung; Jackie Whittington; Robin R High; Evan H Goulding; A Katrin Schenk; Stephen J Bonasera
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.773

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.