Sandra M Farach1, Paul D Danielson2, N Elizabeth Walford3, Richard P Harmel4, Nicole M Chandler5. 1. Division of Pediatric Surgery, All Children's Hospital Johns Hopkins Medicine, Saint Petersburg, FL, USA. Electronic address: sfarach1@jhmi.edu. 2. Division of Pediatric Surgery, All Children's Hospital Johns Hopkins Medicine, Saint Petersburg, FL, USA. Electronic address: Paul.Danielson@jhmi.edu. 3. Division of Pediatric Surgery, All Children's Hospital Johns Hopkins Medicine, Saint Petersburg, FL, USA. Electronic address: nwalfor1@jhmi.edu. 4. Division of Pediatric Surgery, All Children's Hospital Johns Hopkins Medicine, Saint Petersburg, FL, USA. Electronic address: rharmel1@jhmi.edu. 5. Division of Pediatric Surgery, All Children's Hospital Johns Hopkins Medicine, Saint Petersburg, FL, USA. Electronic address: Nicole.Chandler@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Post-operative management following appendectomy is dependent upon intraoperative assessment. We determined concordance between surgical and histopathologic diagnosis to better predict resource utilization in pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 326 patients with operative appendicitis from July 2012 to July 2013 was performed. Based on operative findings, patients were classified as simple appendicitis (SA) or complex appendicitis (CA). RESULTS: The SA group included 194 (59.5%) patients while the CA group included 132 (40.5%) patients. There were significant differences in WBC, CRP, operative time, length of stay, and 30-day complications. Seventy percent of patients with intra-operative findings of SA were found to have complex pathology while 10.6% with intra-operative findings of CA were found to have simple pathology. There is poor agreement between intra-operative findings and histopathologic findings (κ=0.173). Although 70% of patients with intra-operative findings of SA were labeled as complex pathology, 86% followed a fast track protocol (same day discharge) with a low complication rate (1.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Pathology findings that overestimate the severity of disease correlate poorly with the post-operative outcomes for appendicitis. We conclude that operative findings are more predictive of clinical course than histopathologic results. This can have an impact on resource utilization planning.
PURPOSE: Post-operative management following appendectomy is dependent upon intraoperative assessment. We determined concordance between surgical and histopathologic diagnosis to better predict resource utilization in pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 326 patients with operative appendicitis from July 2012 to July 2013 was performed. Based on operative findings, patients were classified as simple appendicitis (SA) or complex appendicitis (CA). RESULTS: The SA group included 194 (59.5%) patients while the CA group included 132 (40.5%) patients. There were significant differences in WBC, CRP, operative time, length of stay, and 30-day complications. Seventy percent of patients with intra-operative findings of SA were found to have complex pathology while 10.6% with intra-operative findings of CA were found to have simple pathology. There is poor agreement between intra-operative findings and histopathologic findings (κ=0.173). Although 70% of patients with intra-operative findings of SA were labeled as complex pathology, 86% followed a fast track protocol (same day discharge) with a low complication rate (1.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Pathology findings that overestimate the severity of disease correlate poorly with the post-operative outcomes for appendicitis. We conclude that operative findings are more predictive of clinical course than histopathologic results. This can have an impact on resource utilization planning.
Authors: Louis J X Giesen; Anne Loes van den Boom; Charles C van Rossem; P T den Hoed; Bas P L Wijnhoven Journal: Dig Surg Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 2.588
Authors: Salomone Di Saverio; Mauro Podda; Belinda De Simone; Marco Ceresoli; Goran Augustin; Alice Gori; Marja Boermeester; Massimo Sartelli; Federico Coccolini; Antonio Tarasconi; Nicola De' Angelis; Dieter G Weber; Matti Tolonen; Arianna Birindelli; Walter Biffl; Ernest E Moore; Michael Kelly; Kjetil Soreide; Jeffry Kashuk; Richard Ten Broek; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Michael Sugrue; Richard Justin Davies; Dimitrios Damaskos; Ari Leppäniemi; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Andrew B Peitzman; Gustavo P Fraga; Ronald V Maier; Raul Coimbra; Massimo Chiarugi; Gabriele Sganga; Adolfo Pisanu; Gian Luigi De' Angelis; Edward Tan; Harry Van Goor; Francesco Pata; Isidoro Di Carlo; Osvaldo Chiara; Andrey Litvin; Fabio C Campanile; Boris Sakakushev; Gia Tomadze; Zaza Demetrashvili; Rifat Latifi; Fakri Abu-Zidan; Oreste Romeo; Helmut Segovia-Lohse; Gianluca Baiocchi; David Costa; Sandro Rizoli; Zsolt J Balogh; Cino Bendinelli; Thomas Scalea; Rao Ivatury; George Velmahos; Roland Andersson; Yoram Kluger; Luca Ansaloni; Fausto Catena Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Seema P Anandalwar; Danielle B Cameron; Dionne A Graham; Patrice Melvin; Jonathan L Dunlap; Mark Kashtan; Matthew Hall; Jacqueline M Saito; Douglas C Barnhart; Brian D Kenney; Shawn J Rangel Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: A L van den Boom; E M L de Wijkerslooth; K A L Mauff; I Dawson; C C van Rossem; B R Toorenvliet; B P L Wijnhoven Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 6.939