OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) cycling with continuous NCPAP in the successful weaning of preterm infants of 25(0)-28(6) wk gestation to nasal prongs. METHODS: A total of 30 infants with a gestational age (GA) of 25(0)-28(6) wk, ventilated for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and extubated to NCPAP were eligible for the study. They were randomized to NCPAP cycling [Group A: cycling between NCPAP of 4 cm and 1 liter per minute (LPM) of nasal prongs] or to continuous NCPAP at 4 cm of H2O (Group B). Primary outcome was successful weaning off NCPAP to nasal prongs at the end of 72 h of the intervention and remaining off NCPAP for the next 72 h. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics were similar in both the groups. Infants were randomized to Group A (n = 13) and Group B (n = 17). The primary outcome was not significantly different between the groups (successful weaning to nasal prongs: 31 vs. 41 %; p 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot, feasibility study there were no differences in the rates of successful weaning of NCPAP to nasal prongs using either cycling NCPAP or continuous NCPAP in preterm infants. A need exists for a large randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine the role of cycling NCPAP on neonatal outcomes.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) cycling with continuous NCPAP in the successful weaning of preterm infants of 25(0)-28(6) wk gestation to nasal prongs. METHODS: A total of 30 infants with a gestational age (GA) of 25(0)-28(6) wk, ventilated for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and extubated to NCPAP were eligible for the study. They were randomized to NCPAP cycling [Group A: cycling between NCPAP of 4 cm and 1 liter per minute (LPM) of nasal prongs] or to continuous NCPAP at 4 cm of H2O (Group B). Primary outcome was successful weaning off NCPAP to nasal prongs at the end of 72 h of the intervention and remaining off NCPAP for the next 72 h. RESULTS: The demographic characteristics were similar in both the groups. Infants were randomized to Group A (n = 13) and Group B (n = 17). The primary outcome was not significantly different between the groups (successful weaning to nasal prongs: 31 vs. 41 %; p 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot, feasibility study there were no differences in the rates of successful weaning of NCPAP to nasal prongs using either cycling NCPAP or continuous NCPAP in preterm infants. A need exists for a large randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine the role of cycling NCPAP on neonatal outcomes.
Authors: M E Avery; W H Tooley; J B Keller; S S Hurd; M H Bryan; R B Cotton; M F Epstein; P M Fitzhardinge; C B Hansen; T N Hansen Journal: Pediatrics Date: 1987-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Leeann R Pavlek; Brian K Rivera; Charles V Smith; Joanie Randle; Cory Hanlon; Kristi Small; Edward F Bell; Matthew A Rysavy; Sara Conroy; Carl H Backes Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 6.314