| Literature DB >> 25781969 |
Lei Wang1, Yong-Liang Jiang1, Jing-Ren Zhang2, Cong-Zhao Zhou1, Yuxing Chen1.
Abstract
LicA plays a key role in the cell-wall phosphorylcholine biosynthesis of Streptococcus pneumonia. Here we determined the crystal structures of apo-form LicA at 1.94 Å and two complex forms LicA-choline and LicA-AMP-MES, at 2.01 and 1.45 Å resolution, respectively. The overall structure adopts a canonical protein kinase-like fold, with the active site located in the crevice of the N- and C-terminal domains. The three structures present distinct poses of the active site, which undergoes an open-closed-open conformational change upon substrate binding and product release. The structure analyses combined with mutageneses and enzymatic assays enabled us to figure out the key residues for the choline kinase activity of LicA. In addition, structural comparison revealed the loop between helices α7 and α8 might modulate the substrate specificity and catalytic activity. These findings shed light on the structure and mechanism of the prokaryotic choline kinase LicA, and might direct the rational design of novel anti-pneumococcal drugs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25781969 PMCID: PMC4364537 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120467
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Crystal parameters, data collection and structure refinement statistics.
| Data Processing | SeMet-LicA | apo-LicA | LicA-AMP-MES | LicA-Choline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Space group |
|
|
|
|
| Unit cell (Å), (°) | 70.00, 96.96, 97.92, 90.00 | 69.35, 96.47, 97.59, 90.00 | 62.34, 62.86, 68.75, 90.00 | 70.39, 96.69, 98.60, 90.00 |
| No. of molecules per asymmetric unit | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Resolution range (Å) | 50.00–2.60 | 50.00–1.94 | 50.00–1.45 | 50.00–2.01 |
| Unique reflections | 21,083 (2,064) | 47,710 (4,732) | 47,856 (4,723) | 44,656 (4,354) |
| Completeness (%) | 99.8 (100) | 97.2 (97.8) | 98.5 (98.8) | 98.2 (98.0) |
| <I/σ(I)> | 11.9 (5.9) | 20.3 (2.8) | 12.3 (2.0) | 16.4 (3.4) |
| Rmerge
| 16.4 (66.6) | 6.2 (52.9) | 8.5 (65.1) | 9.4 (57.1) |
| Average redundancy | 9.5 (9.7) | 3.0 (3.0) | 3.6 (3.6) | 3.4 (3.4) |
|
| ||||
| Resolution range (Å) | 50.00–1.94 | 46.39–1.45 | 50.00–2.01 | |
| R-factor | 21.6/26.2 | 19.3/21.4 | 20.0/23.7 | |
| Number of protein atoms | 4,587 | 2,341 | 4,679 | |
| Number of water atoms | 289 | 328 | 312 | |
| RMSD | 0.010 | 0.006 | 0.010 | |
| RMSD bond angles (°) | 1.107 | 1.042 | 1.138 | |
| Mean B factors (Å2) | 39.2 | 19.4 | 36.2 | |
| Ramachandran plot | ||||
| Most favored (%) | 94.8 | 96.8 | 95.8 | |
| Additional allowed (%) | 5.2 | 3.2 | 4.2 | |
| Outliers (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| PDB entry | 4R77 | 4R78 | 4R7B |
aThe values in parentheses refer to statistics in the highest bin.
bRmerge = ∑hkl∑i|Ii(hkl)-|/∑hkl∑iIi(hkl), where Ii(hkl) is the intensity of an observation and is the mean value for its unique reflection; Summations are over all reflections.
cR-factor = ∑h||Fo(h)|-|Fc(h)||/∑h|Fo(h)||, where |Fo| and |Fc| are the observed and calculated structure-factor amplitudes, respectively.
dR-free was calculated with 5% of the data excluded from the refinement.
eRoot-mean square-deviation from ideal values.
fCategories were defined by Molprobity.
Fig 1Overall structure of LicA.
(A) apo-LicA (blue). The secondary structure elements are labeled sequentially. (B) LicA-choline complex structure (orange). The substrate choline is shown as green sticks, with the Fo-Fc electron-density omit map contoured at 3.0 sigma. (C) LicA-AMP-MES complex structure (magenta). The AMP and MES molecules are shown as yellow sticks, with the Fo-Fc electron-density omit map contoured at 3.0 sigma. (D) Superposition of overall structures between LicA (blue) and H. sapiens hCKα2 (gray). The loopα7-α8 from hCKα2 is labeled in red.
Fig 2The active site.
(A) The choline-binding site of LicA. The binding residues and choline are shown as orange and green sticks, respectively. The secondary structure elements are shown as semi-transparent cartoon. The hydrogen bonds and polar interactions are indicated as dashed lines. (B) The AMP- and MES-binding sites of LicA. The binding residues are shown as magenta sticks whereas the AMP and MES molecules are shown as yellow sticks. (C) Superposition between LicA-AMP-MES (magenta) and human hCKα2-ADP (cyan). (D) Structural comparison of the choline-binding sites of LicA-choline (yellow), LicA-AMP-MES (magenta) and hCKα2-phosphocholine (gray).
Fig 3Conformational changes in the active site.
(A) Comparison between apo-LicA (blue) and LicA-choline (orange) with P-loop shown as cartoon. The choline molecule and the interacting residues are shown as sticks. The hydrogen bonds are indicated as dashed lines. (B) Comparison between LicA-choline (orange) and LicA-AMP-MES (magenta). The choline molecule is shown as green sticks while AMP and MES are shown as yellow sticks. The 18° rotation of the N-terminal domain is indicated as black arrow.
Fig 4Enzymatic activities of wild-type LicA and mutants.
(A) Effect of magnesium or EDTA on LicA activity. (B) The relative enzymatic activities of the wild-type LicA and mutants. One-way ANOVA with a post hoc Dunnett test is used for the comparison of statistical significance. The P values of <0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 are indicated with *, ** and ***, respectively.
Fig 5Multiple-sequence alignment of eukaryotic and prokaryotic choline kinases.
The alignment is generated with the programs Multalin [46] and Espript [47]. Secondary structure elements of LicA and hCKα2 are indicated on the top and bottom of the sequences, respectively. The loopα7-α8 that differs the eukaryotic choline kinases from that of prokaryotes is indicted by a red line on the top of the sequence. The conserved tyrosine residue in the loopα7-α8 is labeled by a green box.