Literature DB >> 25781711

Flexible regression models for rate differences, risk differences and relative risks.

Mark W Donoghoe, Ian C Marschner.   

Abstract

Generalized additive models (GAMs) based on the binomial and Poisson distributions can be used to provide flexible semi-parametric modelling of binary and count outcomes. When used with the canonical link function, these GAMs provide semi-parametrically adjusted odds ratios and rate ratios. For adjustment of other effect measures, including rate differences, risk differences and relative risks, non-canonical link functions must be used together with a constrained parameter space. However, the algorithms used to fit these models typically rely on a form of the iteratively reweighted least squares algorithm, which can be numerically unstable when a constrained non-canonical model is used. We describe an application of a combinatorial EM algorithm to fit identity link Poisson, identity link binomial and log link binomial GAMs in order to estimate semi-parametrically adjusted rate differences, risk differences and relative risks. Using smooth regression functions based on B-splines, the method provides stable convergence to the maximum likelihood estimates, and it ensures that the estimates always remain within the parameter space. It is also straightforward to apply a monotonicity constraint to the smooth regression functions. We illustrate the method using data from a clinical trial in heart attack patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25781711     DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2014-0044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biostat        ISSN: 1557-4679            Impact factor:   0.968


  2 in total

1.  High Treatment Success Rates Among HIV-Infected Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients After Expansion of Antiretroviral Therapy in Botswana, 2006-2013.

Authors:  Sanghyuk S Shin; Chawangwa Modongo; Rosanna Boyd; Cynthia Caiphus; Lesego Kuate; Botshelo Kgwaadira; Nicola M Zetola
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.771

2.  Pitfalls of using the risk ratio in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilyas Bakbergenuly; David C Hoaglin; Elena Kulinskaya
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 5.273

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.