Literature DB >> 25781545

Validation of CFTR intronic variants identified during cystic fibrosis population screening by a minigene splicing assay.

Gianpietro Giorgi, Alberto Casarin, Eva Trevisson, Marta Donà, Matteo Cassina, Claudio Graziano, Luigi Picci, Maurizio Clementi, Leonardo Salviati.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis, caused by mutations of the CFTR gene, is the most common autosomal recessive condition in the European population and there are specific screening programs aimed at investigating healthy carriers. They are usually articulated in two steps: initially individuals are screened with a panel of the 20-50 most common CFTR mutations; the second step is offered to partners of carriers who were found negative at the first test and consists in the analysis of the entire CFTR gene. This strategy provides high sensitivity, however, it often identifies novel variants (especially in introns) of unknown significance. Establishing the pathogenicity of these variants of the CFTR gene is not a simple task.
METHODS: We have examined five CFTR intronic variants of unclear significance (c.274-6T>C, c.744-6T>G, c.1117-64G>A, c.2620-26A>G, and c.3468+51C>A) using a functional splicing assay based on hybrid minigenes.
RESULTS: Four out of five variants (including c.2620-26A>G which was previously reported as a possible splice-site mutation) did not alter the correct splicing of the minigene and are likely to be neutral polymorphisms, whereas c.744-6T>G caused complete skipping of CFTR exon 7 and should be therefore regarded as a pathogenic CFTR mutation.
CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid minigenes assay are a simple and rapid tool to evaluate the effects of intronic variants without the need of analyzing patient's mRNA, and are particularly suited to analyze variants identified during population screenings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25781545     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2014-1047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  3 in total

1.  A synonymous splicing mutation in the SF3B4 gene segregates in a family with highly variable Nager syndrome.

Authors:  Matteo Cassina; Cristina Cerqua; Silvia Rossi; Leonardo Salviati; Alessandro Martini; Maurizio Clementi; Eva Trevisson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  A deep learning approach to identify gene targets of a therapeutic for human splicing disorders.

Authors:  Dadi Gao; Elisabetta Morini; Monica Salani; Aram J Krauson; Anil Chekuri; Neeraj Sharma; Ashok Ragavendran; Serkan Erdin; Emily M Logan; Wencheng Li; Amal Dakka; Jana Narasimhan; Xin Zhao; Nikolai Naryshkin; Christopher R Trotta; Kerstin A Effenberger; Matthew G Woll; Vijayalakshmi Gabbeta; Gary Karp; Yong Yu; Graham Johnson; William D Paquette; Garry R Cutting; Michael E Talkowski; Susan A Slaugenhaupt
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Altered Pre-mRNA Splicing Caused by a Novel Intronic Mutation c.1443+5G>A in the Dihydropyrimidinase (DPYS) Gene.

Authors:  Yoko Nakajima; Judith Meijer; Chunhua Zhang; Xu Wang; Tomomi Kondo; Tetsuya Ito; Doreen Dobritzsch; André B P Van Kuilenburg
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.