OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of a home-based strength training (HBST) intervention on insulin sensitivity (SI), compensatory acute insulin response and β-cell function, body composition measures, and maximum strength in obese Latino boys. METHODS: A total of 26 obese Latino males aged between 14 and 18 years were randomized to either a twice-weekly (n=15) or a control group (C; n=15) for 16 weeks. HBST for 16 weeks, composed of two 1-h sessions per week. Outcome measures were assessed pre-and post-intervention/control condition and included SI, acute insulin response to glucose (AIR) and disposition index (DI), fasting glucose, 2-h glucose, body composition using waist-hip circumferences, body mass index (BMI), dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan, blood pressure, and strength by 1-repetition maximum. A repeated measures GLM was used to assess differences in changes in outcome measures, between the C and the HBST groups. RESULTS: There were no significant overall intervention effects on any of the outcome variables (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that an HBST does not improve SI, maximal strength or decrease adiposity in obese Latino boys.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of a home-based strength training (HBST) intervention on insulin sensitivity (SI), compensatory acute insulin response and β-cell function, body composition measures, and maximum strength in obese Latino boys. METHODS: A total of 26 obese Latino males aged between 14 and 18 years were randomized to either a twice-weekly (n=15) or a control group (C; n=15) for 16 weeks. HBST for 16 weeks, composed of two 1-h sessions per week. Outcome measures were assessed pre-and post-intervention/control condition and included SI, acute insulin response to glucose (AIR) and disposition index (DI), fasting glucose, 2-h glucose, body composition using waist-hip circumferences, body mass index (BMI), dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan, blood pressure, and strength by 1-repetition maximum. A repeated measures GLM was used to assess differences in changes in outcome measures, between the C and the HBST groups. RESULTS: There were no significant overall intervention effects on any of the outcome variables (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that an HBST does not improve SI, maximal strength or decrease adiposity in obese Latino boys.
Authors: Jennifer W Bea; Robert M Blew; Carol Howe; Megan Hetherington-Rauth; Scott B Going Journal: Pediatr Exerc Sci Date: 2017-01-04 Impact factor: 2.333
Authors: Pedro Lopez; Dennis R Taaffe; Daniel A Galvão; Robert U Newton; Elisa R Nonemacher; Victória M Wendt; Renata N Bassanesi; Douglas J P Turella; Anderson Rech Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 10.867
Authors: Luis Diego Méndez-Hernández; Esther Ramírez-Moreno; Rosario Barrera-Gálvez; María Del Consuelo Cabrera-Morales; Josefina Reynoso-Vázquez; Olga Rocío Flores-Chávez; Lizbeth Morales-Castillejos; Nelly Del Socorro Cruz-Cansino; Reyna Cristina Jiménez-Sánchez; José Arias-Rico Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2022-07-01
Authors: Bruno Ribeiro; Pedro Forte; Raquel Vinhas; Daniel A Marinho; Luís B Faíl; Ana Pereira; Fernando Vieira; Henrique P Neiva Journal: Sports Med Open Date: 2022-09-04
Authors: Carles Miguel Guillem; Andrés Felipe Loaiza-Betancur; Tamara Rial Rebullido; Avery D Faigenbaum; Iván Chulvi-Medrano Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-28 Impact factor: 3.390