Literature DB >> 25781340

Reduced Burden of Salmonella enterica in Bovine Subiliac Lymph Nodes Associated with Administration of a Direct-fed Microbial.

J L Vipham1, G H Loneragan1, L M Guillen1, J C Brooks1, B J Johnson1, A Pond1, N Pond1, M M Brashears1.   

Abstract

Despite effective food safety interventions within abattoirs, Salmonella enterica remains a common contaminant of raw ground beef. Research has recently implicated peripheral lymph nodes (PLNs) as a potential route by which Salmonella contaminates ground beef. This study examined the efficacy of using Lactobacillus animalis (formerly designated Lactobacillus acidophilus; NP51) and Propionibacterium freudenreichii (NP24), at 10(9) cfu/head/day, as a direct-fed microbial (DFM) in feedlot cattle diets to control Salmonella within PLNs. Two studies were conducted in which cattle were randomly allocated into either control or DFM treatment groups. Diets of treated cattle were supplemented with 10(9) cfu/head/day of the DFM, while control groups received no DFM supplementation. During slaughter at abattoirs, one subiliac lymph node (SLN) per carcass was collected from 627 carcasses from one study and 99 carcasses from the second study. Lymph nodes were cultured to estimate the presence and concentration of Salmonella. In the first study, effects of DFM supplementation varied across slaughter days. On the first and second slaughter days, prevalence was reduced by 50% (P = 0.0072) and 31% (P = 0.0093), respectively. No significant difference was observed on slaughter day three (P = 0.1766). In the second study, Salmonella was 82% less likely (P = 0.008) to be recovered from SLNs of treatment cattle. While a greater relative risk reduction was observed in the latter study, absolute risk reductions were similar across studies. A significant reduction in the concentration of Salmonella in SLNs (P < 0.0001) on a cfu/g and cfu/node basis was also observed in cattle administered NP51 and NP24 in the first study; in the second study, too few quantifiable SLNs were observed to facilitate meaningful comparisons. The results indicate that NP51 and NP24 supplementation may aid in reducing the prevalence and concentration of Salmonella in SLNs and, therefore, serve as an effective control measure to reduce Salmonella in ground beef products.
© 2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Salmonella; beef products; bovine lymph nodes; direct-fed microbial; pre-harvest interventions

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25781340     DOI: 10.1111/zph.12187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  4 in total

1.  Investigation on Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, and coliforms in beef from Ethiopian abattoirs: A potential risk of meat safety.

Authors:  Andarge Zelalem; Kebede Abegaz; Ameha Kebede; Yitagele Terefe; Jessie L Vipham
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 2.  Antibiotic-Resistant Salmonella in the Food Supply and the Potential Role of Antibiotic Alternatives for Control.

Authors:  Divek V T Nair; Kumar Venkitanarayanan; Anup Kollanoor Johny
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2018-10-11

3.  Effect of a direct-fed microbial (10-G Armor) on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and prevalence of Salmonella in fed-beef heifers.

Authors:  Lauren M Mayer; Kevin Martens; Alyssa B Word; Ben P Holland; Loni L Lucherk; Ty E Lawrence; Travis C Tennant
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Draft Genome Sequence of Lactobacillus salivarius L28 Isolated from Ground Beef.

Authors:  Diana I Ayala; Peter W Cook; David L Campos; Mindy M Brashears; Henk den Bakker; Kendra K Nightingale
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2017-09-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.