Amir Khorram-Manesh1, Michael Ashkenazi2, Ahmadreza Djalali3, Pier Luigi Ingrassia3, Tom Friedl4, Gotz von Armin4, Olivera Lupesco5, Kubilay Kaptan6, Chris Arculeo7, Boris Hreckovski8, Radko Komadina9, Philipp Fisher10, Stefan Voigt11, James James12, Elin Gursky13. 1. 1Prehospital and Disaster Medicine Center,Department of Clinical Sciences,Sahlgrenska Academy,Gothenburg University,Gothenburg,Sweden. 2. 2Bonn International Center for Conversion,Bonn,Germany. 3. 3CRIMEDIM,Universita del Piemonte Orientale,Novara,Italy. 4. 4NHCS,National Health Career School of Management,Hennigsdorf/Berlin,Germany. 5. 5URGENTA,Clinical Emergency Hospital,Bucharest,Romania. 6. 6AFAM,Disaster Research Center,Istanbul Aydin University,Istanbul,Turkey. 7. 7Hanover Associates,Teddington,London,United Kingdom. 8. 8CROUMSA,Croatian Urgent Medicine and Surgery Association, Slav. Brod,Croatia. 9. 9SBC,General and Teaching Hospital Celje, Medical faculty Ljubljana,Slovenia. 10. 10University Clinic Bonn,Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery,Bonn,Germany. 11. 11DLR,German Aerospace Center,Oberpfaffenhofen,Germany. 12. 12Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health,Bethesda,MD,USA. 13. 13Analytic Services, Inc.,Falls Church,VA,USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Unremitting natural disasters, deliberate threats, pandemics, and humanitarian suffering resulting from conflict situations necessitate swift and effective response paradigms. The European Union's (EU) increasing visibility as a disaster response enterprise suggests the need not only for financial contribution but also for instituting a coherent disaster response approach and management structure. The DITAC (Disaster Training Curriculum) project identified deficiencies in current responder training approaches and analyzed the characteristics and content required for a new, standardized European course in disaster management and emergencies. METHODS: Over 35 experts from within and outside the EU representing various organizations and specialties involved in disaster management composed the DITAC Consortium. These experts were also organized into 5 specifically tasked working groups. Extensive literature reviews were conducted to identify requirements and deficiencies and to craft a new training concept based on research trends and lessons learned. A pilot course and program dissemination plan was also developed. RESULTS: The lack of standardization was repeatedly highlighted as a serious deficiency in current disaster training methods, along with gaps in the command, control, and communication levels. A blended and competency-based teaching approach using exercises combined with lectures was recommended to improve intercultural and interdisciplinary integration. CONCLUSION: The goal of a European disaster management course should be to standardize and enhance intercultural and inter-agency performance across the disaster management cycle. A set of minimal standards and evaluation metrics can be achieved through consensus, education, and training in different units. The core of the training initiative will be a unit that presents a realistic situation "scenario-based training."
OBJECTIVE: Unremitting natural disasters, deliberate threats, pandemics, and humanitarian suffering resulting from conflict situations necessitate swift and effective response paradigms. The European Union's (EU) increasing visibility as a disaster response enterprise suggests the need not only for financial contribution but also for instituting a coherent disaster response approach and management structure. The DITAC (Disaster Training Curriculum) project identified deficiencies in current responder training approaches and analyzed the characteristics and content required for a new, standardized European course in disaster management and emergencies. METHODS: Over 35 experts from within and outside the EU representing various organizations and specialties involved in disaster management composed the DITAC Consortium. These experts were also organized into 5 specifically tasked working groups. Extensive literature reviews were conducted to identify requirements and deficiencies and to craft a new training concept based on research trends and lessons learned. A pilot course and program dissemination plan was also developed. RESULTS: The lack of standardization was repeatedly highlighted as a serious deficiency in current disaster training methods, along with gaps in the command, control, and communication levels. A blended and competency-based teaching approach using exercises combined with lectures was recommended to improve intercultural and interdisciplinary integration. CONCLUSION: The goal of a European disaster management course should be to standardize and enhance intercultural and inter-agency performance across the disaster management cycle. A set of minimal standards and evaluation metrics can be achieved through consensus, education, and training in different units. The core of the training initiative will be a unit that presents a realistic situation "scenario-based training."
Entities:
Keywords:
disaster planning; education; emergency medicine; emergency preparedness; government; public health professional
Authors: Mohammed Ali Salem Sultan; Jarle Løwe Sørensen; Eric Carlström; Luc Mortelmans; Amir Khorram-Manesh Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2020-10-29
Authors: Krzysztof Goniewicz; Mariusz Goniewicz; Anna Włoszczak-Szubzda; Frederick M Burkle; Attila J Hertelendy; Ahmed Al-Wathinani; Michael Sean Molloy; Amir Khorram-Manesh Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-01-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Nieves Amat Camacho; Amy Hughes; Frederick M Burkle; Pier Luigi Ingrassia; Luca Ragazzoni; Anthony Redmond; Ian Norton; Johan von Schreeb Journal: PLoS Curr Date: 2016-10-21