| Literature DB >> 25781068 |
Nam-Goo Kang1, Ken Kokubo2, Seaho Jeon3, Min Wang4, Chang-Lyoul Lee5, Taizoon Canteenwala6, Loon-Seng Tan7, Long Y Chiang8.
Abstract
A novel highly luminescent tris-Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25781068 PMCID: PMC6272756 DOI: 10.3390/molecules20034635
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthetic route of tris(DPAF-C9) 7.
Figure 11H-NMR spectra of (a) tris(DPAF-C9) 7, (b) bis(DPAF-C9) 6, (c) mono(DPAF-C9) 5, (d) TPAB 4, and (e) BrF-C9 2.
Figure 213C-NMR spectra of (a) tris(DPAF-C9) 7, (b) bis(DPAF-C9) 6, (c) mono(DPAF-C9) 5, (d) TPAB 4, and (e) BrF-C9 2.
Figure 3MALDI–TOF mass spectra of (a) mono(DPAF-C9) 5, (b) bis(DPAF-C9) 6, and (c) tris(DPAF-C9) 7.
Figure 4(A) UV-vis spectra (solid lines) and photoluminescence (dotted lines) of (a) tris(DPAF-C9) 7, (b) bis(DPAF-C9) 6, (c) mono(DPAF-C9) 5, (d) TPAB 4, and (e) BrF-C9 2 in CHCl3 at a concentration of 1.0 × 10−5 M and (B) normalized absorption and PL intensity of 5–7 at the excitation wavelength of 360 nm.
Figure 5Cyclic voltammograms (CV) of (A–C) at different voltages vs Ag/AgCl with (a) tris(DPAF-C9) 7, (b) bis(DPAF-C9) 6, and (c) mono(DPAF-C9) 5 solution in a concentration of 1.75 × 10‒3 M in CH3CN–CH2Cl2, containing (n-butyl)4N+-PF6‒ electrolyte (0.4 M), using Pt as working and counter electrodes and Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode at a scan rate of 10 mV/s.
Electrochemical properties of mono-5, bis-6, and tris(DPAF-C9) 7.
| Compound | HOMO (eV) | LUMO (eV) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tris(DPAF-C9) | 0.83 | 3.24 | ||
| Bis(DPAF-C9) | 0.83 | 3.26 | ||
| Mono(DPAF-C9) | 0.83 | 3.28 |
Estimated from the onset oxidation potential; Estimated from the onset of absorption edge.
Figure 6Optimized geometrical structures of tris(DPAF-C9) 7, by calculation, showing a different degree of interaction force among terminal t-butyl groups (brown).
Calculated heat of formation for tris(DPAF-Cn) .
| R | Δ | ΔΔ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Cn) | |||||
| ( | |||||
| Me | 258.38 | 253.67 | 247.85 | 4.71 | 10.53 |
| Et | 231.59 | 223.91 | 233.48 | 7.68 | 1.89 |
| 87.01 | 95.12 | 93.67 | −8.11 | −6.66 | |
| C7 | 59.59 | 64.00 | 60.07 | −4.41 | −0.48 |
| C8 | 22.23 | 28.10 | 22.52 | −5.87 | −0.29 |
| C9 | −9.13 | −4.40 | −9.19 | −4.73 | 0.06 |
Calculated by semi-empirical PM3 method using Spartan 08. Substituents at 9-fluorenyl position. C7: 3-methylhexyl group (3-Me); C8: 5,5-dimethylhexyl group (4-t-Bu); C9: 3,5,5-trimethylhexyl group (3-Me-4-t-Bu).
DFT calculation of heat of formation for tris(DPAF-Cn) .
| R | Δ | ΔΔ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (Cn) | |||
| Et | −1922585.7 | −1922609.1 | 23.4 |
| MeOC2H4 | −2353750.4 | −2353762.0 | 11.6 |
| −2514673.7 | −2514677.3 | 3.6 | |
| C9 | −2958697.2 | −2958703.8 | 6.6 |
Calculated at B3LYP/6-31G* level of theory using SPARTAN08. Substituents at 9-fluorenyl position.
Figure 7Torsional (dihedral) angles between aryl–nitrogen bond and center benzene ring for (a) cup-form and (b) propeller-form of tris(DPAF-C9) 7.