| Literature DB >> 25780800 |
Andrea Beaton1, Craig Sable1, Juliette Brown2, Joshua Hoffman3, Michael Mungoma4, Charles Mondo4, Nezith Cereb5, Colin Brown2, Marshall Summar1, Jurgen Freers4, Maria Beatriz Ferreira6, Magdi Yacoub, Ana Olga Mocumbi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endomyocardial fibrosis (EMF) is the most common form of restrictive cardiomyopathy worldwide. It has been linked to poverty and various environmental factors, but-for unknown reasons-only some people who live in similar conditions develop the disease. EMF cases cluster within both families and ethnic groups, suggesting a role for a genetic factor in host susceptibility. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system is associated with predisposition to various diseases. This two-center study was designed to investigate variation in the HLA system between EMF patients and unaffected controls. We provide the first genetic investigation of patients with EMF, as well as a comprehensive review of the literature.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiomyopathy; Endomyocardial Fibrosis; Genetic Suceptibility
Year: 2014 PMID: 25780800 PMCID: PMC4355520 DOI: 10.5339/gcsp.2014.60
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Cardiol Sci Pract ISSN: 2305-7823
Criteria for assessment of the severity of endomyocardial fibrosis.
| Criterion | Score |
| Major Criteria | |
| Endomyocardial plaques >2mm in thickness | 2 |
| Thin ( < 1mm) endomyocardial patches affecting more than one ventricular wall | 3 |
| Obliteration of the right ventricular or left ventricular apex | 4 |
| Thrombi or spontaneous contrast without severe ventricular dysfunction | 4 |
| Retraction of the right ventricular apex (right ventricular apical notch) | 4 |
| AVV dysfunction due to adhesion of the valvular apparatus to the ventricular wall | 1–4* |
| Minor Criteria | |
| Thin endomyocardial patches localized to one ventricular wall | 1 |
| Restrictive flow pattern across mitral or tricuspid valves | 2 |
| Pulmonary-valve diastolic opening | 2 |
| Diffuse thickening of the anterior mitral leaflet | 1 |
| Enlarged atrium with normal sized ventricle | 2 |
| M-movement of the interventricular septum and flat posterior wall | 1 |
| Enhanced density of the moderator or other intraventricular bands | 1 |
* The score is assigned according to the severity of atrioventricular regurgitation[8], AVV: Atrioventricular valve.
Figure 1.Endomyocardial fibrosis of the right ventricle. 1A: Echocardiogram in apical 4-chamber view with characteristic features of (O) obliteration and (R) retraction of the right ventricle with reduction of the right ventricular cavity size. Notice thickening of the tricuspid valve, dilatation of the right atrium and pericardial effusion 1B: Echocardiogram in paraternal short axis view shows a large fibrotic plaque with marked fibrosis and calcification. Again, noted are the enlarged right atrium and large pericardial effusion.
Figure 2.The study was conducted in 2 countries with high prevalence rates of EMF – Uganda and Mozambique.
Demographic characteristics of patients with severe EMF and successful HLA typing.
| Mozambique (n = 40) | Uganda (n = 31) | |
| Age (mean, range) | 14.9 (5-45) | 23 (15–35) |
| Gender (% female) | 21 (52.5%) | 21 (68.0%) |
| Disease Distribution | ||
| Right-ventricular EMF | 23 (57.5%) | 18 (58.0%) |
| Bi-ventricular EMF | 17 (42.5%) | 13 (42.0%) |
Disease distribution represented by total number per cohort (percentage of patients for each cohort).
Selected HLA-A (3A) and HLA-B (3B) phenotype frequencies in EMF cases and controls for two populations.
| HLA-A* | Uganda controls n = 48 | Uganda patients n = 31 | Mozambique controls n = 89 | Mozambique patients n = 40 |
| % phenotype frequency | ||||
| 01:01 | 8.3 (4) | 16.1 (5) | 5.6 (5) | 12.5 (5) |
| 02:01 | 20.8 (10) | 22.6 (7) | 18.0 (16) | 10.0 (4) |
| 02:02 | 6.2 (3) | 29.0 (9)† | 5.6 (5) | 5.0 (2) |
| 02:05/08 | 2.1 (1) | 0 | 9.0 (8) | 17.5 (7) |
| 03:01 | 12.5 (6) | 9.7 (3) | 6.7 (6) | 12.5 (5) |
| 23:01 | 25.0 (12) | 9.7 (3) | 22.5 (20) | 12.5 (5) |
| 29:01/02 | 10.4 (5) | 16.1 (5) | 23.6 (21) | 27.5 (11) |
| 30:01 | 6.2 (3) | 9.7 (3) | 15.7 (14) | 10.0 (4) |
| 30:02 | 18.7 (9) | 9.7 (3) | 25.8 (23) | 15.0 (6) |
| 32:01 | 6.2 (3) | 6.4 (2) | 2.2 (2) | 0 |
| 33:01/03 | 8.3 (4) | 6.4 (2) | 6.7 (6) | 17.5 (7) |
| 34:02 | 6.2 (3) | 0 | 1.1 (1) | 7.5 (3) |
| 36:01 | 6.3 (3) | 9.7 (3) | 3.4 (3) | 2.5 (1) |
| 66:01 | 8.3 (4) | 6.4 (2) | 3.4 (3) | 5.0 (2) |
| 68:02 | 14.6 (7) | 12.9 (4) | 18.0 (16) | 7.5 (3) |
| 74:01/02/03 | 20.8 (10) | 29.0 (9) | 9.0 (8) | 20.0 (8) |
3A: Selected HLA-A phenotype frequencies (n)) in EMF cases and controls for two populations.
† p = < 0.01.
Figure 3.Distribution of HLA alleles determined to have significance for the 2 populations. 3A: Mozambique; 3B: Uganda.
Selected HLA-A (3A) and HLA-B (3B) phenotype frequencies in EMF cases and controls for two populations.
| HLA-B* | Uganda controls n = 48 | Uganda patients n = 31 | Mozambique controls n = 89 | Mozambique patients n = 40 |
| % phenotype frequency | ||||
| 07:02 | 6.2 (3) | 3.2 (1) | 9.0 (8) | 5.0 (2) |
| 08:01 | 16.7 (8) | 6.4 (2) | 11.2 (10) | 15.0 (6) |
| 13:02 | 2.1 (1) | 0 | 5.6 (5) | 2.5 (1) |
| 14:02 | 4.2 (2) | 19.3 (6) | 7.9 (7) | 7.5 (3) |
| 15:03 | 10.4 (5) | 12.9 (4) | 19.1 (17) | 17.5 (7) |
| 15:10 | 10.4 (5) | 6.4 (2) | 12.4 (11) | 7.5 (3) |
| 15:17 | 0 | 6.4 (2) | 0 | 0 |
| 18:01 | 8.3 (4) | 6.4 (2) | 3.4 (3) | 2.5 (1) |
| 35:01 | 6.2 (3) | 6.4 (1) | 11.2 (10) | 2.5 (1) |
| 39:10 | 0 | 0 | 5.6 (5) | 0 |
| 42:01 | 14.6 (7) | 16.1 (5) | 14.6 (13) | 5.0 (2) |
| 44:03 | 8.3 (4) | 0 | 15.7 (14) | 17.5 (7) |
| 44:15 | 0 | 9.7 (3) | 0 | 0 |
| 45:01 | 16.7 (8) | 12.9 (4) | 7.9 (7) | 5.0 (2) |
| 49:01 | 8.3 (4) | 9.7 (3) | 7.9 (7) | 7.5 (3) |
| 51:01 | 4.2 (2) | 6.4 (2) | 2.2 (2) | 0 |
| 53:01 | 14.6 (7) | 12.9 (4) | 10.1 (9) | 17.5 (7) |
| 57:02 | 6.2 (3) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 57:03 | 0 | 6.4 (2) | 6.7 (6) | 5.0 (2) |
| 58 | 20.8 (10) | 35.5 (11) | 14.6 (17) | 37.5 (15)† |
| 58:01 | 8.3 (4) | 16.1 (5) | 13.5 (12) | 25.0 (10) |
| 58:02 | 12.5 (6) | 25.8 (8) | 6.7 (6) | 15.0 (6) |
| 81:01/02 | 12.5 (6) | 9.7 (3) | 9.0 (8) | 15.0 (6) |
3B: Selected HLA-B phenotype frequencies in EMF cases and controls for two populations.
† p = 0.03.