Literature DB >> 25780239

The impacts of new street light technologies: experimentally testing the effects on bats of changing from low-pressure sodium to white metal halide.

Emma Louise Stone1, Andrew Wakefield2, Stephen Harris2, Gareth Jones2.   

Abstract

Artificial light at night is a major feature of anthropogenic global change and is increasingly recognized as affecting biodiversity, often negatively. On a global scale, newer technology white lights are replacing orange sodium lights to reduce energy waste. In 2009, Cornwall County Council (UK) commenced replacement of existing low-pressure sodium (LPS) high intensity discharge (HID) street lights with new Phillips CosmoPolis white ceramic metal halide street lights to reduce energy wastage. This changeover provided a unique collaborative opportunity to implement a before-after-control-impact field experiment to investigate the ecological effects of newly installed broad spectrum light technologies. Activity of the bat species Pipistrellus pipistrellus, P. pygmaeus and Nyctalus/Eptesicus spp. was significantly higher at metal halide than LPS lights, as found in other studies of bat activity at old technology (i.e. mercury vapour) white light types. No significant difference was found in feeding attempts per bat pass between light types, though more passes overall were recorded at metal halide lights. Species-specific attraction of bats to the metal halide lights could have cascading effects at lower trophic levels. We highlight the need for further research on possible ecosystem-level effects of light technologies before they are installed on a wide scale.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Philips CosmoPolis lights; artificial lighting; ecosystem-level effects; light pollution

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25780239      PMCID: PMC4375367          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  9 in total

1.  Street lighting changes the composition of invertebrate communities.

Authors:  Thomas W Davies; Jonathan Bennie; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Artificial night lighting affects dawn song, extra-pair siring success, and lay date in songbirds.

Authors:  Bart Kempenaers; Pernilla Borgström; Peter Loës; Emmi Schlicht; Mihai Valcu
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Light pollution as a biodiversity threat.

Authors:  Franz Hölker; Christian Wolter; Elizabeth K Perkin; Klement Tockner
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Shedding light on moths: shorter wavelengths attract noctuids more than geometrids.

Authors:  Robin Somers-Yeates; David Hodgson; Peter K McGregor; Adrian Spalding; Richard H Ffrench-Constant
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Jonathan Bennie; Thomas W Davies; John Hopkins
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2013-04-08

6.  Mercury vapour lamps interfere with the bat defence of tympanate moths (Operophtera spp.; Geometridae)

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Artificial light at night advances avian reproductive physiology.

Authors:  Davide Dominoni; Michael Quetting; Jesko Partecke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Street lighting disturbs commuting bats.

Authors:  Emma Louise Stone; Gareth Jones; Stephen Harris
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Artificial light pollution: are shifting spectral signatures changing the balance of species interactions?

Authors:  Thomas W Davies; Jonathan Bennie; Richard Inger; Natalie Hempel de Ibarra; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 10.863

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Response of bats to light with different spectra: light-shy and agile bat presence is affected by white and green, but not red light.

Authors:  Kamiel Spoelstra; Roy H A van Grunsven; Jip J C Ramakers; Kim B Ferguson; Thomas Raap; Maurice Donners; Elmar M Veenendaal; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Artificial light at night alters behavior in laboratory and wild animals.

Authors:  Kathryn L G Russart; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2018-05-28

3.  Street lighting has detrimental impacts on local insect populations.

Authors:  Douglas H Boyes; Darren M Evans; Richard Fox; Mark S Parsons; Michael J O Pocock
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 14.957

4.  The biological impacts of artificial light at night: the research challenge.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Marcel E Visser; Franz Hölker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 6.671

Review 5.  Enlightening Butterfly Conservation Efforts: The Importance of Natural Lighting for Butterfly Behavioral Ecology and Conservation.

Authors:  Brett M Seymoure
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 2.769

6.  No effect of artificial light of different colors on commuting Daubenton's bats (Myotis daubentonii) in a choice experiment.

Authors:  Kamiel Spoelstra; Jip J C Ramakers; Natalie E van Dis; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2018-05-29

7.  Comparing acoustic and radar deterrence methods as mitigation measures to reduce human-bat impacts and conservation conflicts.

Authors:  Lia R V Gilmour; Marc W Holderied; Simon P C Pickering; Gareth Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Ecological impacts of the LED-streetlight retrofit on insectivorous bats in Singapore.

Authors:  Kenneth Ee Meng Lee; W H Deon Lum; Joanna L Coleman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Migratory bats respond to artificial green light with positive phototaxis.

Authors:  Christian C Voigt; Manuel Roeleke; Lara Marggraf; Gunārs Pētersons; Silke L Voigt-Heucke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Switch from Low-Pressure Sodium to Light Emitting Diodes Does Not Affect Bat Activity at Street Lights.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Rowse; Stephen Harris; Gareth Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.