Literature DB >> 25780237

Tuning the white light spectrum of light emitting diode lamps to reduce attraction of nocturnal arthropods.

Travis Longcore1, Hannah L Aldern2, John F Eggers2, Steve Flores2, Lesly Franco2, Eric Hirshfield-Yamanishi2, Laina N Petrinec2, Wilson A Yan2, André M Barroso3.   

Abstract

Artificial lighting allows humans to be active at night, but has many unintended consequences, including interference with ecological processes, disruption of circadian rhythms and increased exposure to insect vectors of diseases. Although ultraviolet and blue light are usually most attractive to arthropods, degree of attraction varies among orders. With a focus on future indoor lighting applications, we manipulated the spectrum of white lamps to investigate the influence of spectral composition on number of arthropods attracted. We compared numbers of arthropods captured at three customizable light-emitting diode (LED) lamps (3510, 2704 and 2728 K), two commercial LED lamps (2700 K), two commercial compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs; 2700 K) and a control. We configured the three custom LEDs to minimize invertebrate attraction based on published attraction curves for honeybees and moths. Lamps were placed with pan traps at an urban and two rural study sites in Los Angeles, California. For all invertebrate orders combined, our custom LED configurations were less attractive than the commercial LED lamps or CFLs of similar colour temperatures. Thus, adjusting spectral composition of white light to minimize attracting nocturnal arthropods is feasible; not all lights with the same colour temperature are equally attractive to arthropods.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthropods; indoor lighting; light emitting diodes; phototaxis; vector-borne disease

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25780237      PMCID: PMC4375365          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.671


  29 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of color vision in insects.

Authors:  A D Briscoe; L Chittka
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Street lighting changes the composition of invertebrate communities.

Authors:  Thomas W Davies; Jonathan Bennie; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Detection of minute temperature transients by thermosensitive neurons in ants.

Authors:  Markus Ruchty; Flavio Roces; Christoph Johannes Kleineidam
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Night and crepuscular mosquitoes and risk of vector-borne diseases in areas of piassaba extraction in the middle Negro River basin, state of Amazonas, Brazil.

Authors:  Martha Cecília Suárez-Mutis; Nelson Ferreira Fé; Wilson Alecrim; José Rodrigues Coura
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.743

Review 5.  The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Jonathan Bennie; Thomas W Davies; John Hopkins
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2013-04-08

6.  Suppression of melatonin secretion in some blind patients by exposure to bright light.

Authors:  C A Czeisler; T L Shanahan; E B Klerman; H Martens; D J Brotman; J S Emens; T Klein; J F Rizzo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Efficiency evaluation of Nozawa-style black light trap for control of anopheline mosquitoes.

Authors:  Hee Il Lee; Bo Youl Seo; E-Hyun Shin; Douglas A Burkett; Jong-Koo Lee; Young Hack Shin
Journal:  Korean J Parasitol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 1.341

8.  Light pollution in ultraviolet and visible spectrum: effect on different visual perceptions.

Authors:  Héctor Antonio Solano Lamphar; Miroslav Kocifaj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Artificial light pollution: are shifting spectral signatures changing the balance of species interactions?

Authors:  Thomas W Davies; Jonathan Bennie; Richard Inger; Natalie Hempel de Ibarra; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 10.863

10.  Using remotely sensed night-time light as a proxy for poverty in Africa.

Authors:  Abdisalan M Noor; Victor A Alegana; Peter W Gething; Andrew J Tatem; Robert W Snow
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2008-10-21
View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Exposure to Artificial Light at Night and the Consequences for Flora, Fauna, and Ecosystems.

Authors:  Jack Falcón; Alicia Torriglia; Dina Attia; Françoise Viénot; Claude Gronfier; Francine Behar-Cohen; Christophe Martinsons; David Hicks
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.152

2.  Artificial light at night as an environmental pollutant: An integrative approach across taxa, biological functions, and scientific disciplines.

Authors:  Davide M Dominoni; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2018-10

3.  The biological impacts of artificial light at night: the research challenge.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Marcel E Visser; Franz Hölker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 6.671

4.  Wavelength-dependent effects of artificial light at night on phytoplankton growth and community structure.

Authors:  Christina Diamantopoulou; Eleni Christoforou; Davide M Dominoni; Eirini Kaiserli; Jakub Czyzewski; Nosrat Mirzai; Sofie Spatharis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Artificial Light at Night Increases Aedes aegypti Mosquito Biting Behavior with Implications for Arboviral Disease Transmission.

Authors:  Samuel S C Rund; Laura F Labb; Owen M Benefiel; Giles E Duffield
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.707

6.  Method to improve the survival of night-swarming mayflies near bridges in areas of distracting light pollution.

Authors:  Ádám Egri; Dénes Száz; Alexandra Farkas; Ádám Pereszlényi; Gábor Horváth; György Kriska
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.653

7.  Light manipulation of mosquito behaviour: acute and sustained photic suppression of biting activity in the Anopheles gambiae malaria mosquito.

Authors:  Aaron D Sheppard; Samuel S C Rund; Gary F George; Erin Clark; Dominic J Acri; Giles E Duffield
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Response of Different Insect Groups to Various Wavelengths of Light under Field Conditions.

Authors:  Hongsheng Pan; Gemei Liang; Yanhui Lu
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  Artificial nighttime lighting impacts visual ecology links between flowers, pollinators and predators.

Authors:  Emmanuelle S Briolat; Kevin J Gaston; Jonathan Bennie; Emma J Rosenfeld; Jolyon Troscianko
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Experimentally comparing the attractiveness of domestic lights to insects: Do LEDs attract fewer insects than conventional light types?

Authors:  Andrew Wakefield; Moth Broyles; Emma L Stone; Gareth Jones; Stephen Harris
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.