Literature DB >> 2577948

An analysis of the sources of musculoskeletal system impedance.

J Winters1, L Stark, A H Seif-Naraghi.   

Abstract

When antagonistic muscles co-contract, the impedance of musculoskeletal systems to applied loads is known to increase. In this paper a physiologically-based, higher-order, nonlinear antagonistic muscle-joint model is utilized to clarify the sources of impedance modulation during a variety of tasks, ranging from resisting transient loads to holding steady loads to making fast movements in unpredictable surroundings. It is shown that impedance modulation occurs automatically as a function of the specific operating ranges utilized during a given task by each of four different muscle-joint mechanical relations. The relative contribution of each relation depends on the type of task, with impedance during quasi-static conditions sensitive to muscle tension-length and sometimes joint parallel elastic properties and during dynamic tasks dominated by the series element and muscle force-velocity properties. Elimination of any of these causes a decrease in built-in biomechanical capabilities. These findings raise questions concerning past theories on stiffness-impedance modulation which appear to underestimate the role of inherent biomechanical properties.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2577948     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90248-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  11 in total

1.  Direct measurement of human ankle stiffness during quiet standing: the intrinsic mechanical stiffness is insufficient for stability.

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Martin Lakie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Model-based estimation of active knee stiffness.

Authors:  Serge Pfeifer; Michael Hardegger; Heike Vallery; Renate List; Mauro Foresti; Robert Riener; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2011

3.  Dynamic elongation of the vertebral artery during an in vitro whiplash simulation.

Authors:  K Nibu; J Cholewicki; M M Panjabi; L B Babat; J N Grauer; R Kothe; J Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Age-related changes in open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms.

Authors:  J J Collins; C J De Luca; A Burrows; L A Lipsitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  An improved muscle-reflex actuator for use in large-scale neuro-musculoskeletal models.

Authors:  J M Winters
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Muscle and joint elastic properties during elbow flexion in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  C Cornu; F Goubel; M Fardeau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Stiffness and damping in postural control increase with age.

Authors:  Massimo Cenciarini; Patrick J Loughlin; Patrick J Sparto; Mark S Redfern
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  The passive, human calf muscles in relation to standing: the non-linear decrease from short range to long range stiffness.

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Constantinos N Maganaris; Martin Lakie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Muscle co-contraction modulates damping and joint stability in a three-link biomechanical limb.

Authors:  Stewart Heitmann; Norm Ferns; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  From biomechanics to sport psychology: the current oscillatory approach.

Authors:  Guy Cheron
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.