OBJECTIVE: Although positive association between abortion and breast cancer was frequently reported from case-control studies, results from prospective studies were still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate this association based on prospective studies. METHODS: PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge and Embase were systematically searched for prospective studies on the association between abortion and breast cancer up to April 2014, supplemented by manual searches on the references. Two reviewers independently conducted the literature search, study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment of included studies. Random effects models were used to estimate the combined relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs). RESULTS: Fifteen prospective studies [14 focused on induced abortion (IA), and 12 focused on spontaneous abortion (SA)] were included in the final analysis. The combined RRs (95 % CIs) of breast cancer risk were 1.00 (0.94-1.05) [1.00 (0.92-1.08) for cumulative-incidence data and 1.00 (0.94-1.05) for incidence-rate data] for IA, and 1.02 (0.95-1.09) [1.06 (0.96-1.16) for cumulative-incidence data and 1.01 (0.92-1.09) for incidence-rate data] for SA, respectively. Non-significant associations of breast cancer with IA and SA were also found among nulliparous women, women with abortion before or after the first full-term pregnancy, women with one or ≥ 2 abortions, and women with first abortion after 30 years old. CONCLUSION: The current prospective evidences are not sufficient to support the positive association between abortion (including IA and SA) and breast cancer risk.
OBJECTIVE: Although positive association between abortion and breast cancer was frequently reported from case-control studies, results from prospective studies were still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate this association based on prospective studies. METHODS: PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge and Embase were systematically searched for prospective studies on the association between abortion and breast cancer up to April 2014, supplemented by manual searches on the references. Two reviewers independently conducted the literature search, study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment of included studies. Random effects models were used to estimate the combined relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs). RESULTS: Fifteen prospective studies [14 focused on induced abortion (IA), and 12 focused on spontaneous abortion (SA)] were included in the final analysis. The combined RRs (95 % CIs) of breast cancer risk were 1.00 (0.94-1.05) [1.00 (0.92-1.08) for cumulative-incidence data and 1.00 (0.94-1.05) for incidence-rate data] for IA, and 1.02 (0.95-1.09) [1.06 (0.96-1.16) for cumulative-incidence data and 1.01 (0.92-1.09) for incidence-rate data] for SA, respectively. Non-significant associations of breast cancer with IA and SA were also found among nulliparous women, women with abortion before or after the first full-term pregnancy, women with one or ≥ 2 abortions, and women with first abortion after 30 years old. CONCLUSION: The current prospective evidences are not sufficient to support the positive association between abortion (including IA and SA) and breast cancer risk.
Authors: Anders P Mikkelsen; Pia Egerup; Julie F M Ebert; Astrid M Kolte; Henriette S Nielsen; Øjvind Lidegaard Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2019-10-09
Authors: Elham Manouchehri; Ali Taghipour; Vahid Ghavami; Fatemeh Homaei Shandiz; Abbas Ebadi; Robab Latifnejad Roudsari Journal: Int J Prev Med Date: 2022-02-23
Authors: Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari; Soheila Sayad; Saed Sayad; Maryam Khayamzadeh; Leila Shojaee; Zeynab Shormeji; Mojtaba Amiri Journal: Int J Breast Cancer Date: 2017-11-01